Author Topic: Network Monitor Custom Rule Bug or Grammatical Error?  (Read 1608 times)

Offline GercekSeytan

  • Comodo Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
Network Monitor Custom Rule Bug or Grammatical Error?
« on: August 20, 2006, 06:23:28 PM »
After creating a rule in which the "except" box is checked for specified ports, the change is not shown correctly.

Example: Create a rule allowing TCP/UDP outgoing "except" on ports 1900, 2869, 3389 and 5000. When one checks the rule, it wil show in network monitor as "...allow outgoing on 1900, 2869...".

 (J)

Offline egemen

  • Comodo Staff
  • Comodo's Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 3380
Re: Network Monitor Custom Rule Bug or Grammatical Error?
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2006, 07:40:44 PM »
After creating a rule in which the "except" box is checked for specified ports, the change is not shown correctly.

Example: Create a rule allowing TCP/UDP outgoing "except" on ports 1900, 2869, 3389 and 5000. When one checks the rule, it wil show in network monitor as "...allow outgoing on 1900, 2869...".

 (J)

Yes I have reproduced. Grammatical error.

Thx for the feedback
Egemen

Offline GercekSeytan

  • Comodo Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
Re: Network Monitor Custom Rule Bug or Grammatical Error?
« Reply #2 on: August 28, 2006, 06:49:10 PM »
You're welcome. Thanks for the reply.
   

(:WAV)


 (L)



 

Free Endpoint Protection
Seo4Smf 2.0 © SmfMod.Com Smf Destek