|
JNavas
Guest
|
 |
Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« on: December 15, 2008, 05:04:07 PM » |
|
The on-demand virus scanner saturates the computer so much that it's difficult to do anything else on the computer while it is running. I think two additional on-demand scanning priority options are needed: - Low priority, freeing enough resources so the computer is usable
- Idle priority, only scanning when disk and CPU are idle (much like Microsoft Desktop Search indexing)
This is the highest item on my wish list.Thanks for CIS and for listening, John
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 06, 2009, 11:43:40 AM by JNavas »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ronny
Product Translator
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
   
Offline
Posts: 13253
Volunteer Moderator
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2008, 03:56:44 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2008, 05:04:20 PM » |
|
 +1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Windows 7 x64 AMD FX 8120, 8gb ram, ATI 6870 1gb
|
|
|
|
CGPMaster
Guest
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2008, 05:05:22 PM » |
|
+1 To Give It More Priority....
CG
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ronny
Product Translator
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
   
Offline
Posts: 13253
Volunteer Moderator
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2008, 05:12:21 PM » |
|
Don't forget to vote on the poll guy's ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
J_G
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2008, 07:31:02 PM » |
|
+1....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DaRtH VaDeR.
Usability Study Member
Comodo's Hero
   
Offline
Posts: 1785
Everything in life comes to an end, exept life
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2009, 11:51:03 AM » |
|
Yes! I agree. I recall AVG Antivirus has a slider where you can arrange the scanspeed and impact on system recources...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
DaRtH VaDeR says: "The path of success and progress is not to be reached by the things you have done, but by the things you will do, so think before you act,the voice of your history will confirm this fact.."
DaRtH VaDeR says: "Your system is as secure as the weakest link in your entire security"
|
|
|
|
Budda
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2009, 05:14:11 PM » |
|
+1 for me, purely from a gamers/media generator's perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LaserWraith
pillow fighting fool
Usability Study Member
Comodo's Hero
   
Offline
Posts: 4594
I'm going to go out with a bang like terrorists
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2009, 06:17:58 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
LeoniAquila
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2009, 06:21:51 PM » |
|
 LA
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
spasserfan
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2010, 09:12:49 AM » |
|
+1 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
FBTFQYCS
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2010, 10:04:52 AM » |
|
 I would greatly welcome having the option to set run prioroty on the Scanner Settings and Run A Scan functions. Comodo certainly knows how to do this since it has implemented user configured settings for both processor and disk usage with Comodo Backup.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
EricJH
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2010, 07:42:48 PM » |
|
+1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Cristy
Malware Research Group
Comodo's Hero
   
Offline
Posts: 280
Romania
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #13 on: November 27, 2010, 09:17:29 AM » |
|
+1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jarold
Comodo Member

Offline
Posts: 28
|
 |
Re: Low and Idle priority options needed for on-demand Scanner
« Reply #14 on: November 27, 2010, 04:51:19 PM » |
|
You got my vote as well. Let me cite to Kaspersky as an example again. It allows to " concede resources to other applications".
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|