Which Product to develop next?

[Guest]

[shinobiteno]

Maybe redesign the current security approach making some kind of smart "Comodo Security", thats able to route the network and file traffic/transactions(CPF), search for malware(CAVS/BO), protect with virtualisation(like layered Altris SVS), protect files/data streams(for ex. Credit card No).

I don't mean standalone versions under one roof. I mean redesigned modular security application that provides total security. And hopefully stays free/donation(why not? )


Also

An IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) with the ability to write ones OWN IPS RULES or modify existing rules similar (or I would say EXACTLY like) eeye digital security's SUPERIOR Blink™ Intrusion Prevention system which has recently bowed to market pressure and is slowly becoming a CRAP BLOATED "all-in-one" solution. Blink (www.eeye.com) uses unique method of so-called "pre-emptive" defense for network based attacks such as unknown/undiscovered "zero-day" buffer overflows.

Also, Blink does NOT support Vista or any x64 based architectures (yet). This is a problem for us since our Windows based servers MUST be x64 to prevent choking on our current system-loads. But even if they weren't, it wouldn't matter since the Blink Server product is ultra expensive (from what I understand).

Alternatively, we'd like to see an application based on the snort (www.snort.org) engine which is actually PAINLESS to setup/configure/maintain. There has NEVER in 10+ years of snort's existence been available a half-way decent front-end that made snort easy to install and configure on Win32.

Basically a lightweight ULTRA-powerful IPS that can beat eeye's product and that WILL NOT be overwhelmed with bloat in less then 1000 builds...

I totaly agree to that. BTW Comodo already has buffer overfollow-prevention system.

Thank you Melih!

[panic]

Comodo are working towards co-operative modularity. The next version of CAVS will co-operatively use the HIPs components of the firewall.

Patience grasshopper, patience.

Ewen :-)

[joed]

We want to start getting feedback from our users about which products, in the field of security and trust, you would like to see us develop next?

thanks
Melih

I tried to access trustfax from my pocket pc ---- I can but cant view any documents or send faxes-- are you developing a mobile trustfax package for pocket pc?

[Melih]

I tried to access trustfax from my pocket pc ---- I can but cant view any documents or send faxes-- are you developing a mobile trustfax package for pocket pc?

In our roadmap..

Melih

[panic]

TrustConnect for mobile??

[kmprasad]

oops sorry!

I opened another thread instead of posting here!

[kmprasad]

As it says, (I opened an unnecessary thread - my apologies) - an anti keylogger or a key scrambler is what I would like..

But pls make sure that if (when???) it is bundled with CFP or CAV, it would still be available as a standalone.

[andyman35]

As it says, (I opened an unnecessary thread - my apologies) - an anti keylogger or a key scrambler is what I would like..

But pls make sure that if (when???) it is bundled with CFP or CAV, it would still be available as a standalone.

I wouldn't worry,Melih has said many times that the option will be there to have separate modules or a combined suite. 

[Melih]

yup..confirmed..

Melih

[panic]

TrustConnect for mobile??

DOH!! I meant Trust Connect for Windows Mobile

[Frosty Port]

what i would like to see comodo implement would be a anti-redirect that could be added to the firewall and accessed after a warning in the same window along with a SCRIPT filter I have been using comodo firewall for some time and never regretted a minuet of it but i think if these to things could be added  it would make a world of differents 
   

[gibran]

Hallo,

Comodo has a very active Forum Community and V3 specifically suggest this Forum to ask for Support.

So in order to further improve support requests and troubleshooting V3 should have a Ruleset and Configuration Report.

This way Members don't have to post screenshots and export Logs.

There should be only one place to go to generate a full textual report that list all the rules in a textual or HTML format.
This will shorten mostly all support Topics and will reduce the need to ask for missing or incomplete infos.

It would be easier to post a report containing something like

iexplore.exe
ALLOW TCP OUT from IP any to IP any where source PORT is any destination port is 80
ALLOW UDP OUT from IP any to IP any where source PORT is any destination port is 53
BLOCK IP IN/OUT from IP any to IP any

iexplore.exe
DNS client Service ALLOW
Loopback Networking ALLOW
Disk ALLOW
Keyboard ALLOW
Computer Monitor ALLOW
Protected Files and Folders ASK
Protected Files and Folder Allowed List:
   C:\windows\temp\*
Protected Files and Folder Blocked List:
   C:\windows\system32\*

instead of attaching screenshots or writing a ruleset by hand.

Another way to improve support would be the ability to import a textual rule in an application. So if a member doesn't know how
to use the configuration dialogs it will possible to import another member generated ruleset for that app.

I guess that D+ Diagnostic can export its report too or provide a more detailed one in order to troubleshoot ceratin incompatibilities and issues.

I guess that a separate throubleshooting and reporting product could fullfill this task too.

[Melih]

what i would like to see comodo implement would be a anti-redirect that could be added to the firewall and accessed after a warning in the same window along with a SCRIPT filter I have been using comodo firewall for some time and never regretted a minuet of it but i think if these to things could be added  it would make a world of differents 
   

Can you pls expand on this request.
thanks
Melih

[panic]

I think he means a means of warning when a site is doing a redirect, like the ebay > DoubleClick > ebay shuffle that goes on. Only guessing, though.

Ewen :-)

[Frosty Port]

Can you pls expand on this request.
thanks
Melih

Yes would be happy to as we all know web site are made and advertised as one thing but turn out to be another. after clicking the link you are redirected to  let's say a [warz] site the page was made to redirect the victim to a site that loads a virus, Trojan, Mal-wear with out the victim having any chance of backing out of the site. as they script the browser and lock you in. Now that's where the Anti-redirect comes in it could cache the redirect by detecting the change in the link/script. and lock the browser and flash a small window to alert the soon to be victim that the site is redirecting theme to a known bad site and allow them to just kill the request and the FW could make a automatic rule to block that sites IP and any site it is pointing to and send feed back to comodo just like the file summiting that it already has         

[Tags:]