Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 07, 2008, 11:54:15 PM

Login with username, password and session length

198008 Posts
22789 Topics
54752 Members

Latest Member: NaruZap

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  General Category
| |-+  Which Product do you want Comodo to develop next?
| | |-+  Keylogger defeater
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Keylogger defeater  (Read 6305 times)
Calypze
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 24


« on: February 21, 2008, 05:21:50 PM »

I think it would fit very well with Comodo's business philosophy to develop a keylogger defeater like the one QFX Software has developed. Maybe there is no need to, as KeyScrambler works well, but it costs (if you want other strokes than usernames and passwords protected) but well, there are free firewalls available, yet Comodo has developed a free firewall as well.

I at least wanted to utter the idea.
Logged
M.Python
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2008, 12:11:25 AM »

Well, KeyScrambler is not the only good anti-keylogger. I am using http://www.anti-keylogger.com and really like the way it works. As for the money, it is actually normal that good products cost some money. But you should always be able to compare the cost of the software with the potential losses that you will bear if  someone interecepts your credit card number using a keylogger...
Logged
andyman35
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 606


« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2008, 07:25:09 AM »

I'm not sure that a separate keylogger is necessary with CFP installed,defence+ should prevent any KL installation.However it's a good idea for those that aren't using the firewall and would fit in with the Comodo philosophy.
Logged
asker
Comodo Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 37


« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2008, 02:30:30 PM »

I would ask you to develop something like sandoxing product, which could for example isolate our browser entirely from the real pc like greenborder or sandboxie do. It would be great to have such free product, especially if it was that good as  comodo firewall.
And it would be great if you developed some antiphishing technology, or more exact a tool or program, that would block load of any known malware-infested webpage in web browser.

That is more a joke than a preposition, but what about a stealth-like no jscript web browser alternative to firefox heheh.... I know, sound it would not have any chanse of getting much users...

that is from me
enjoy yourself a bit time
Logged
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5651



WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2008, 05:58:57 PM »

I would ask you to develop something like sandoxing product, which could for example isolate our browser entirely from the real pc like greenborder or sandboxie do. It would be great to have such free product, especially if it was that good as  comodo firewall.
And it would be great if you developed some antiphishing technology, or more exact a tool or program, that would block load of any known malware-infested webpage in web browser.

That is more a joke than a preposition, but what about a stealth-like no jscript web browser alternative to firefox heheh.... I know, sound it would not have any chanse of getting much users...

that is from me
enjoy yourself a bit time


Sandboxing is interesting....
Antiphishing is interesting...
as to sites with malware: well, cpf will prevent any malware anyway even if the user goes to a site, so isn't it redundant?

thanks
Melih
Logged

andyman35
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 606


« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2008, 08:49:08 PM »

Sandboxing is interesting....
Antiphishing is interesting...
as to sites with malware: well, cpf will prevent any malware anyway even if the user goes to a site, so isn't it redundant?

thanks
Melih

A Comodo browser sandbox would seem like a logical step to me,it could be implemented both as a component of CFP and as a standalone product.I've had mixed results using external sandboxing utils alongside CFP,Bufferzone and SafeSpace causing system slowdown,SandboxIE runs ok though.  Viva Comodo
« Last Edit: February 25, 2008, 08:55:20 PM by andyman35 » Logged
asker
Comodo Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 37


« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2008, 04:29:20 AM »

Sandboxing is interesting....
Antiphishing is interesting...
as to sites with malware: well, cpf will prevent any malware anyway even if the user goes to a site, so isn't it redundant?

thanks
Melih

Oh, I did not think of that. Thank's to inform/remind me.
I guess I do not know how efficient comodo firewall actually is. Great to hear more news on and on..
Logged
Luketan
Computer Security Testing Group
Comodo Loves me
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 194


« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2008, 06:07:02 AM »

Oh, I did not think of that. Thank's to inform/remind me.
I guess I do not know how efficient comodo firewall actually is. Great to hear more news on and on..

The danger here is if the user himself decides to install something which turns out to be a keylogger....
Logged
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5651



WWW
« Reply #8 on: May 04, 2008, 11:56:48 AM »

The danger here is if the user himself decides to install something which turns out to be a keylogger....

yes thats where you might require a detection based technolgy..when  you are running uknown programs..

melih
Logged

gibran
Forum Member
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3757


Sometimes words are meaningless indeed...


« Reply #9 on: May 07, 2008, 08:05:14 PM »

The danger here is if the user himself decides to install something which turns out to be a keylogger....

Yep there is a chance that CFP may fail. So it would be better to complement CFP with an AV.
Hopefully the number of detected keylogging techniques will increase since CFP is an evolving product and there is still space left for improvements.


BTW do you have any Keylogger PoC you tested against your product of choice?
It would be nice to post them all in this topic.

I only have one .Net sample CFP isn't able to catch. I heard of another one different from Anti-Keylogger Tester but I cannot manage to find it.


« Last Edit: May 08, 2008, 08:30:53 AM by gibran » Logged

Luketan
Computer Security Testing Group
Comodo Loves me
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 194


« Reply #10 on: May 08, 2008, 06:44:08 AM »

Come on Luketan,no need!! CBOCleans not a bad little application Yes or No,and im sure ive seen Avira/Avast recommended somewhere.What would you recommend?


I can't recommend Avira/Avast because this is a comodo forum. CBOclean is not bad but that isn't my point, I'm referring to all those excuses about CAVS's poor performance...

Matt,

My problem is with this artificial hype about "focusing on prevention"  where prevention is defined in such a way that it does not "prevent" you from infection if you choose to run a program that turns out to be a trojan.

Leaving aside the strange fact that protection from such infections are called "detections" according to comodo's scheme, are we pretending that this isn't a serious problem?





Logged
panic
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5461


... and I say to myself, "What a wonderful world"


« Reply #11 on: May 08, 2008, 07:28:11 AM »

Hey Luketan,

Quote
I  can't recommend Avira/Avast because this is a comodo forum.

As a point of fact, you can recommend a non-Comodo product on these forums.

This has never been prohibited and AFAIK never will be.

Please feel free to post your recommendations.

Ewen :-)

Logged

As your mums would say, "If you can't play nice with all the other kiddies, go home".
All users are asked to please read and abide by the  Comodo Forum Policy.
If you don't like it, don't use the forum.
andyman35
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 606


« Reply #12 on: May 08, 2008, 08:14:55 AM »

The point about the inherent shortcomings of a prevention strategy had some validity though.The weakest point of such a method will always be the user that insists on running or installing 'abc.exe' or '123 codec' in order to run a game or video for example,despite warnings about unknown processes flashing up.

Ultimately people need protecting from themselves which requires some form of detection.
Logged
panic
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5461


... and I say to myself, "What a wonderful world"


« Reply #13 on: May 08, 2008, 08:24:51 AM »

Categorically.

"To find out if something is truly fool-proof, first add a fool."  Wink

Detection must play a role in any security environment, along with removal and prevention.

Ewen :-)
Logged

As your mums would say, "If you can't play nice with all the other kiddies, go home".
All users are asked to please read and abide by the  Comodo Forum Policy.
If you don't like it, don't use the forum.
gibran
Forum Member
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3757


Sometimes words are meaningless indeed...


« Reply #14 on: May 08, 2008, 08:37:06 AM »

I guess we'll not see any keylogger PoC posted in this topic.

Anyway as soon as CFP is going to improve I'm going to experiment with a behavioural enforcement approach and other side-aspects of CFP.
Logged

Tags:
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Firewall
Page created in 0.464 seconds with 19 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com