Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 21, 2010, 08:09:22 AM

Login with username, password and session length

373421 Posts
41422 Topics
94154 Members

Latest Member: Quiksilver93

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  General Category
| |-+  Which Product do you want Comodo to develop next?
| | |-+  A search result rating program like McAfee SiteAdvisor?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: A search result rating program like McAfee SiteAdvisor?  (Read 2664 times)
Agent24
Comodo Loves me
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 107


« on: April 04, 2009, 06:16:32 PM »

That would be quite useful, especially if it was a builtin option of CIS
Logged
LaserWraith
pillow fighting fool
Usability Study Member
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3672


Anything besides absolute truth is illogical.


WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2009, 07:19:33 PM »

That would be quite useful, especially if it was a builtin option of CIS

The problem is that it could block some legit and ok sites.  Or, like what happens with SiteAdvisor, site 'A' links to a "bad site," site 'B'.  SiteAdvisor rates site 'A' as bad now.  Site 'A' sees their mistake, and removes the offending link.  But it will take a longgg time (maybe 100 days) before SiteAdvisor checks it again.


Or (again), site 'Z' is clean.  SiteAdvisor (I'll call it SA now) rates it as clean.  But then site 'Z' puts malicious code in the webpage, and users think they are safe because SA didn't say it was a bad site.  It will take a long time for SA to re-rate the page.



So the best way is to just "protect" the user from the threats, and not to decide if the site is bad.
Logged

John Buchanan
Behold, There be dragons beyond these walls
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2744


Behold, there be Dragons here!


« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2009, 07:26:11 PM »

If you really want something of that nature, may I suggest Finjan SecureBrowsing?
Logged

Please follow Comodo Forum Policy

Maximus III Formula, i7-860 [at] 3.7GHz, 8GB DDR3-1600, Win7 Ultimate x64
LaserWraith
pillow fighting fool
Usability Study Member
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3672


Anything besides absolute truth is illogical.


WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2009, 04:13:02 PM »

If you really want something of that nature, may I suggest Finjan SecureBrowsing?


Do you use it?  Has anyone else?  I want some "reliable" recommendations.  Smiley
Logged

Beanie
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 550


I am a saxophonist.


« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2009, 04:26:06 PM »

Do you use it?  Has anyone else?  I want some "reliable" recommendations.  Smiley

I'm reliable Grin

When I used Firefox/IE, I used the WOT (Web of Trust) extension. It's similar to SA in that it uses user opinions, but it also gets ratings from sights like hpHosts, MVP's Hosts, and Malware Domains Wink

I use Opera now, but I still use the WOT Bookmarklet whenever I'm not sure about a site Smiley

Regards,

Beanie Smiley
Logged
Agent24
Comodo Loves me
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 107


« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2009, 06:14:21 PM »

If you really want something of that nature, may I suggest Finjan SecureBrowsing?


I saw a review from a while ago which said it was pretty bad, I was going to try it but since the lack of any good recent reviews I didn't bother

I'm currently using LinkScanner Lite on one PC but since XPL was aquired by AVG you can't download it from their site anymore and I imagine any updates will only be available in the AVG version (which comes with AVG Antivirus and you have to buy it Sad )
Logged
John Buchanan
Behold, There be dragons beyond these walls
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2744


Behold, there be Dragons here!


« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2009, 06:38:44 PM »

Yes I use it.  I would not have suggested it otherwise.
Logged

Please follow Comodo Forum Policy

Maximus III Formula, i7-860 [at] 3.7GHz, 8GB DDR3-1600, Win7 Ultimate x64
Kyle
Computer Security Testing Group
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3370



WWW
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2009, 07:32:21 PM »

Comodo is meant to be building some sort of website vulnerability scanning which I think is a far better dececion than a community based rating system.. How ever there has not been any word on development progress for some months.
Logged

Windows XP
E5200 2.5ghz [at] 3.33ghz, POV 9800gt 512mb, 2gb DDR2 RAM.  500gb. HDD

Ubuntu
P4 [at] 3ghz, Radeon x300 128mb
1gb DDR2 Ram 80GB HDD
John Buchanan
Behold, There be dragons beyond these walls
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2744


Behold, there be Dragons here!


« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2009, 07:45:23 PM »

Thanks for reminding me, Kyle.  Yes, the approach was to input the website in question, the test software would check to see if it or its links were considered safe, if I remember correctly.
It would be interesting to know how this project is progressing.
Logged

Please follow Comodo Forum Policy

Maximus III Formula, i7-860 [at] 3.7GHz, 8GB DDR3-1600, Win7 Ultimate x64
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8651



WWW
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2009, 08:16:45 PM »

Comodo is meant to be building some sort of website vulnerability scanning which I think is a far better dececion than a community based rating system.. How ever there has not been any word on development progress for some months.

ok here it is...
http://siteinspector.comodo.com/app/public/inputURL

Still some work to be done...
but this is a realtime check of an URL.
It checks if the Site is Malicious... (not if the site has malicious content). (there is a big difference).

play around and see.. this will be a part of the overall search result rating product. We intend to check these URLs at least daily. However we are still long way away from this. This is just an alpha service to play with.. Enjoy and we would welcome any feedback on this as to how we can improve it.

thanks
Melih
Logged

Kyle
Computer Security Testing Group
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3370



WWW
« Reply #10 on: April 07, 2009, 08:23:01 AM »

 That's good. Melih is this an updated version of the one a couple of months ago? Are there anymore keyelements to be added into this? Smiley
Logged

Windows XP
E5200 2.5ghz [at] 3.33ghz, POV 9800gt 512mb, 2gb DDR2 RAM.  500gb. HDD

Ubuntu
P4 [at] 3ghz, Radeon x300 128mb
1gb DDR2 Ram 80GB HDD
lyn
Comodo Loves me
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 111



« Reply #11 on: April 07, 2009, 09:13:20 AM »

So will this be a kind of FSB, SA, WOT comodo super hybrid?
Logged
Kyle
Computer Security Testing Group
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3370



WWW
« Reply #12 on: April 07, 2009, 09:49:17 AM »

No, Nothing like WOT (I havn't tried the others)
The program will not rely on comunity raitings, It will scan the site to see if it will attack you.

Note. There is a difference between sites hosting malware and an attack site.
Logged

Windows XP
E5200 2.5ghz [at] 3.33ghz, POV 9800gt 512mb, 2gb DDR2 RAM.  500gb. HDD

Ubuntu
P4 [at] 3ghz, Radeon x300 128mb
1gb DDR2 Ram 80GB HDD
LaserWraith
pillow fighting fool
Usability Study Member
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3672


Anything besides absolute truth is illogical.


WWW
« Reply #13 on: April 07, 2009, 11:11:21 AM »

I think it will be a bit like "Finjan SecureBrowsing", which scans websites for malicious 'attacks' on a search page.  (John B. told me about it, see above.)
Logged

Bin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4



« Reply #14 on: April 08, 2009, 09:00:31 PM »

i dont think "community rating" is unuseful. the point is "how to rate".
surfing with "overprotection" may bring down UE.

i think most "lazy" users more like surfing following other's suggestion.
Logged
Tags:
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Certificate Free Virus Removal Firewall
Page created in 0.07 seconds with 18 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com