Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 21, 2008, 10:04:35 AM

Login with username, password and session length

184904 Posts
21468 Topics
52062 Members

Latest Member: 15edwards

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Want to help Comodo?
| |-+  Please tell us your views and Vote here!
| | |-+  Thanks Comodo
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Thanks Comodo  (Read 1322 times)
Griff
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« on: August 30, 2007, 05:38:29 AM »

I recently tried Comodo Firewall on a few Win2K and XP boxes, and was impressed with what I found. I am a Network Security Engineer with quite a bit of experience with Corporate firewall systems, including FW1, Pix, and Linux based systems.

I used ZAP Pro for my own systems, particularly for those not behind a SPI equipped router. While it worked reasonably well, it was always a bit of a resource hog, and the overhead tended to adversely effect some applications.

I was looking for something with a simple interface, that would quickly configure itself, BUT would also allow for expert set rules (that followed 'typical' syntax of high-end FW systems). Comodo fit the spec nicely Smiley

I beat on Comodo FW with nmap for a few hours, and tried a wide variety of tricks and clever scans to see if I could get into the box in question.... Comodo performed perfectly, even with some of my custom rules configured.

Nice work guys, excellent FW all around. I'll definitely be recommending Comodo.

Thanks,

Griff
Logged
N.T.T.W.
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1124


A minute of your time can help many.


« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2007, 05:57:49 AM »

Thanks for that Griff and welcome to the forums.

Nice to see another satisfied user!

Keep an eye out for CFP 3, it is in beta testing at the moment but promises to be superb.

 Smiler
Logged

Post proelia praemia.
Die dulci fruere.
David Ranieri
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2007, 03:51:32 PM »

Just wanted to let you know I came to you all by looking for certs for email encryption. I hate some techs sitting at the ISP reading peoples mail and such because they can and are board. I know my wife worked for one of the largest. She left because of the sneaky stuff she said she did not want to work some place or any place where one has to lie or buffalo anyone. Well I am trying the backup program now and it installed great with no problems and to be honest the best looking and fastest installer I seen as well as the registration. Nice work. I am going to install all your free products and do a real test and a network vulernability test after all is done will let you all know.
Logged
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5252



WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2007, 05:20:42 PM »

Just wanted to let you know I came to you all by looking for certs for email encryption. I hate some techs sitting at the ISP reading peoples mail and such because they can and are board. I know my wife worked for one of the largest. She left because of the sneaky stuff she said she did not want to work some place or any place where one has to lie or buffalo anyone. Well I am trying the backup program now and it installed great with no problems and to be honest the best looking and fastest installer I seen as well as the registration. Nice work. I am going to install all your free products and do a real test and a network vulernability test after all is done will let you all know.

You got the problem spot on David!

Email is totally insecure!

why don't you try our funky new Secure Email product (you can download it from the Comodo Secure Email board in this forum). It makes securing email a breeze..and you can let us know how we can improve it.

thanks
Melih
Logged

Griff
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2007, 03:14:00 PM »

Thanks for that Griff and welcome to the forums.

Nice to see another satisfied user!

Keep an eye out for CFP 3, it is in beta testing at the moment but promises to be superb.

 Smiler

Thanks Cheesy

How will CFP3 compare to the current version in regards to system overhead?

One of the things that I always found annoying about ZAP was how intrusive it was on system performance.
Logged
Little Mac
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6000



« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2007, 04:55:32 PM »

How will CFP3 compare to the current version in regards to system overhead?
At present, v3 (current beta) on my machine is running just under 7MB combined between the two running processes.  Peak so far has been just under 15MB.

LM
Logged

date
dcfldd split=2G conv=noerror hashwindow=0 hash=md5 hashlog=/mnt/sda1/images/hash.log if=/dev/hda of=/mnt/sda1/images/LM.dd
date
cat LM.dd.* | md5sum > verify.log
date
Griff
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« Reply #6 on: August 31, 2007, 10:04:54 PM »

Sounds good to me Cheesy

Definitely keep the code tight and to the point... theres nothing worse than bloat-ware Wink
Logged
Tags:
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Firewall
Page created in -0.237 seconds with 18 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com