Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2013, 05:23:09 AM

Login with username, password and session length

663521 Posts
70550 Topics
153510 Members

Latest Member: SusanNls

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Learn about Computer Security and Interact with Security Experts
| |-+  Other Security Products
| | |-+  CIS 5.10 with IObit Malware Fighter Pro
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: CIS 5.10 with IObit Malware Fighter Pro  (Read 7913 times)
Nige_39
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 225



« on: July 08, 2012, 01:37:09 PM »

I just wonder by running CIS 5.10 with IObit Malware Fighter Pro would it make CIS 5.10 run less affective?

On the other hand, having them both running will it give my PC great Protection.

so to anyone who knows can you advice me.

Regards

Nigel

« Last Edit: July 08, 2012, 01:46:37 PM by Nige_39 » Logged

loveboy_lion
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 465


COMODO Is Good Hope We Make it The BEST !


WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2012, 02:11:02 PM »

No Iobit malware fighter pro wont provide extra security along with CIS but if you already paid for it then its ok to use it along with CIS
if you wana know more about security configs you can check this site for advance configs and feel free to ask anything about protection and stuff
Malwaretips
Thanks
Logged

Nige_39
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 225



« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2012, 02:23:24 PM »

Thanks for that Info loveboy_lion.

I will keep it running the way it is. Mind you I just had a quick look deep inside that progam I spoke about and it said : Fully compatible with All Antivirus Products Everyone needs qualified antivirus software, and IObit Malware Fighter will surely be the best mate for your current antivirus.  < so I will take their word.

I have looked at that site, and I wll join it to get more info

Thanks for your help

Regards

Nigel.
« Last Edit: July 08, 2012, 02:28:48 PM by Nige_39 » Logged

Nige_39
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 225



« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2012, 08:22:33 AM »

I have dumped IObit Malware Fighter Pro! it was not as good as I thought, so I thought I would say.

Regards

Nige
Logged

andrei1997
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 522



« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2012, 10:33:11 PM »

Iobit malware fighter free sucks. idk about the paid version
Logged
Nige_39
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 225



« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2012, 03:32:00 AM »

I agree with you andrei1997

I tried the paid version as well and was OK. I'm not going to rave about it. I did a few tests with a few sites, and it failed on some and good on the others.

So If I was you! I would go for the paid option! Give it a good test, then see how you feel about it.

Once after you testing it,  and you feel it's not that good for you then choose the refund option since you get 30 days 

I wish you the best on what ever you do

Regards

Nigel
Logged

Nemesis31
Comodo Loves me
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 128


WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2012, 04:17:31 AM »

Hello,

i dont' love IOBit
==> http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=29681
Logged

NSG001
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 361


malware .exe cutioner


« Reply #7 on: August 05, 2012, 04:56:01 AM »


This is incredibly OLD news.
Probably best left unsaid  Lips Sealed
Logged

Solarlynx
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1126



« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2012, 05:19:15 AM »

I use IObit toolbox . I like it.
Logged
andrei1997
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 522



« Reply #9 on: August 05, 2012, 05:42:08 PM »

That from 2 years ago and I don't think Iobit is stealing anymore definitions from malwarebytes.
Logged
andrei1997
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 522



« Reply #10 on: August 05, 2012, 06:04:04 PM »

I agree with you andrei1997

I tried the paid version as well and was OK. I'm not going to rave about it. I did a few tests with a few sites, and it failed on some and good on the others.

So If I was you! I would go for the paid option! Give it a good test, then see how you feel about it.

Once after you testing it,  and you feel it's not that good for you then choose the refund option since you get 30 days 

I wish you the best on what ever you do

Regards

Nigel
I am new to the Testing Av products thing Still Learning from websites I find on the internet that have good info on zero day malware. I am stuck with windows 7 home premium so I can't really open up a good virtual machine. so If you can give me tips or help. I would greatly appreciate it.
Logged
spainach_12
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 457



« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2012, 09:31:14 AM »

I am new to the Testing Av products thing Still Learning from websites I find on the internet that have good info on zero day malware. I am stuck with windows 7 home premium so I can't really open up a good virtual machine. so If you can give me tips or help. I would greatly appreciate it.

I don't see why you can't open up a good virtual machine in 7 home premium, but in any case, if it's limited hardware that's the problem then this may help:

I'd like to share how I used to do my testing (I no longer do tests). See if you can get anything from it:

What I need:
Bootable Linux USB
GParted
Hiren's BootCD
1 Linux
Dual-boot XP's: FAT32 and another with NTFS. I'll refer to them as XP1 and XP2)

XP1 has FAT32 file system, Sandboxie, and whatever suite I'll be testing, ProcessHacker, Unlocker
XP2 has NTFS file system with custom file permissions for particular folders, LUA+EMET+Wondershare Time Freeze 2, Easy File Locker, Unlocker, Sandboxie+BSA, and my preferred security setup

1. Before running tests, make sure that the AV (I'm assuming you're testing a suite or an av) is already updated.
2. Download the samples via Linux and archive them to keep them from running. Copy them on the XP system
3. In the XP system, I have Sandboxie installed  and force IE to be Sandboxed whenever it is run.
4. Final updates before extraction. Turn off the wireless router.
5. Extract and run EACH malware in an isolated folder (I mean to say in a folder of its own). This is strenuous and time-consuming, but it allows you to identify which went undetected. This will be helpful in tracking it down later.
6. List down detected and undetected malware. Undetected malware are copied from the Linux built and analyzed via ThreatExpert/Sandboxie+BSA (if upload fails). Behavior is analyzed and logged in a text file. Copy the text file to the bootable USB.
7. Boot from the Linux USB and manually remove remnants. (Do this while still possible. You don't want errors while formatting. Too time-consuming and wears out your patience and hard drive.)
8. Reboot to confirm activity. If no activity is traced, proceed to formatting and reinstallation.

I had no trouble with this setup before.


Backing up your MBR is also important. In any case, having separate systems to do your testing is better. This method of testing not only ensures I know which suites are good at what they do, but it also helps me understand further what could have been the cause of the failed detections, whether they were justifiable or not. It also ensures that all the malware will work accordingly (since I've discovered in one of my tests, some of them are able to detect sandboxes and vm's, and refuses to run if in one).

Analyzing malware behavior also allows you to develop methods to counter or better yet, prevent malware from activating or at the very least, spreading. This method helped me recognize the use of NTFS file format in helping minimize the damage and spreading of Autorun Viruses as well as how to detect, bypass, and finally eliminate shortcut viruses at a time they were still proliferate and many went undetected.

As per OS choice, that's entirely up to you and your hardware. Some work, some doesn't. You can't learn if you don't make mistakes. The process I use is rather time-consuming and difficult. It can still be improved, but I no longer do tests. It's up to you if you'd choose the same method or another. Cheesy Good luck!
Logged

If you want to change the system, you need to learn how to break it.

Windows 7 Starter dualboot PeppermintOS | Windows Firewall | NTFS File Permissions | Commandline | Common Sense
Tags:
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Certificate Free Virus Removal Firewall
Page created in 0.052 seconds with 21 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines Design by 7dana.com