at Alan Borer
dude, you are for sure the only one who is protected against the gpcode (an example), just by having this opinion about my statement. if its so false, go on, run it. (everyone else, dont do it!!!)
i wasnt wrong in what i meant, and i didnt "kowingly spread lies" (wasnt that an accusing of doing lie???). so i was right to write about the new situation.
"an antivirus can be important" is in this case a fact. it has a name now, and you still describe it as "FALSE"? i dont say it to say something about comodos protection. i just speak about antivirus.
for me is the most important part of protection, to know about possible holes/bad decisions ect.
btw, no need to play detective in your free time. i usually edit my posts until they fit. and if i edit something in reaction to later happenings, i mark the related part as EDIT. in this example i added something about the sandbox..... .... while gpcode needed extra settings for the sandbox... who knows what the future brings... better close eyes and say "yeah, perfect now!"
? or what did you try to tell me?
i am able to correct a post, so i edit. you not?
you didnt get my point anyway. my theoretical point got a name, a real example which was even more dangerous than my thought.
i stand up for a justified opinion. if thats thin skin for you, you should allways take an opinion of someone else.... never yours!
at The Wolf
you are right. its the only company where i write in their forum, because its worth it
... i liked the most that the program is able to become better.... and to become better, you need to know what could become better
.... a "yeah" helps for the moment, a "wait, look!" could help in the long term.