CIS Certifications, Test Results & Reviews

[Guest]

[Solarlynx]

Anti-Malware.ru Firewall test
http://www.anti-malware.ru/firewall_test_outbound_protection_2011

DefenseWall as usually beats all rivals even Comodo. The great plus for DefenseWall - it does not emit many pop-ups. Comodo at paranoidal made 100% too but as they mentioned with many false alarms and I guess too many pop-ups.

[morphiusz]

[at]Up
Only default settings when auto sandbox is enabled  user gets only  few popups/none popups - 1 point less than on paranoid.

[Siketa]

It's time to put another award sticker on the web page...

[Solarlynx]

It's time to put another award sticker on the web page...

When they translate their test to English.

[Cristy]

Read here
They have used two test packs: a base one with 31 attacks and an advanced one with 9 attacks.

Final result with maximum settings:
Comodo – 100%
DefenseWall - 100%
Kaspersky – 96%
PC Tools – 94%
Outpost – 91%
Online Armor – 88%
Online Solutions – 86%
BitDefender – 80%
Dr.Web si F-Secure – 75% fiecare
ESET – 74%
Jetico – 73%
Last places: AVG – 38%, Avira – 28%, Microsoft – 13%

Source: faravirusi.com

[savit]

Nice COMODO!

[illumination]

Free Internet Security for Small Businesses

Are you looking to cut expenses for your small business or organization? You can save some cash by replacing those annual antivirus subscriptions with free equivalents

Read More

[pc_pete]

On Comodo, MSE and OpenDNS, that is.

Thanks.

[Szadout]

can you pls paste it here for easy reading. thank you for your efforts!

fixed

safegroup.pl detection test (30.000 samples):

http://forum.safegroup.pl/vii-test-programow-zabezpieczajacych-detekcji-t4923.html

Google translate:

The test was attended by 20 security programs. Setup program changed to the maximum.
Scanning was carried out in each of the programs two times to eliminate as many pests and that the result is more reliable.

Updates of virus database programs were conducted October 1, then off, programs that scan a "cloud" test were among the very day that the result was the most reliable compared to other programs in the test.

Has already become a tradition that the test was conducted in a virtual machine - VMWare Workstation running Windows XP HE SP3 with 800Mb memory framework. The system updated.

For testing I used a package containing 30 000 malware files, the package has a capacity of about 15GB, gathered from our forum and the internet for the test.

The package included a variety of viruses, rootkits since the trojans and backdoors any smaller and larger caliber, always causing harm to the users.

TEST RESULTS:

1.CIS 2012 - 29538 / 30000 98.46% 120 minutes

2.Panda IS 2012 - 29516 / 30000 98.38% 195 minutes

3.KIS 2012 - 29487 / 30000 98.29% 300 minutes

4.NIS 2012 - 29377 / 30000 97.92% 265 minutes

5.BullGuard IS 2012 - 29341 / 30000 97.80% 145 minutes

6.Vipre IS 2012 b - 29105 / 30000 97.01% 260 minutes

7.Ad-Aware - 29050 / 30000 96.83% 215 minutes

8.Eset SS 5 - 28874 / 30000 96.24% 165 minutes

9.Emsisoft A-M - 28829 / 30000 96.09% 65 minutes

10.MBAM - 28803/30000 96.01% 60 minutes

11.Avira IS 2012 - 28738 / 30000 95.79% 90 minutes

12.G Date of IS 2012 - 28638 / 30000 95.46% 120 minutes

13.F-Secure IS 2012 b - 28591 / 30000 95.30% 245 minutes

14.Immunet Protect 3 - 28500/30000 95% 80 minutes

15.BitDefender IS 2012 - 28298 / 30000 94.32% 215 minutes

16.AVG IS 2012 - 27577 / 30000 91.92% 158 minutes

17.Avast 6 Free - 27568/30000 91.89% 124 minutes

18.Panda Cloud AV - 26063 / 30000 86.87% 210 minutes

19.MSE 2 - 25989 / 30000 86.63% 325 minutes

20.OSS PRO - 25553/30000 85.17% 150 minutes

Test made on my notebook from Lenovo, the two core processor, 2x 2.0GHz, 4Gb ram.
Scanning time programs may vary on different hardware configuration.

Thank you for your attention and comments.

[Siketa]

safegroup.pl detection test (30.000 samples):
http://translate.google.pl/translate?hl=pl&sl=pl&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.safegroup.pl%2Fvii-test-programow-zabezpieczajacych-detekcji-t4923.html

Nice....
But it's still taking a long time for AV lab to make signatures based on submitted files that I sent.

[Melih]

safegroup.pl detection test (30.000 samples):
http://translate.google.pl/translate?hl=pl&sl=pl&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.safegroup.pl%2Fvii-test-programow-zabezpieczajacych-detekcji-t4923.html

can you pls paste it here for easy reading. thank you for your efforts!

[GOA]

victorh2007 tested CIS 5,8 with default settings on Youtube.

Subtitle in English with CC-button

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5McSJATe7fs&feature=channel_video_title

[Melih]

fixed

safegroup.pl detection test (30.000 samples):

http://forum.safegroup.pl/vii-test-programow-zabezpieczajacych-detekcji-t4923.html

Google translate:

Excellent results, welldone to CIS! Once again the real world tests done by real people (who are not paid testing organisations) show the real power of CIS!

Melih

[drama]

If only the real world test by a real person was not unethical and outdated, it might mean something.

[iSquirtink]

If only the real world test by a real person was not unethical and outdated, it might mean something.

Drama Queen "Don't hate because your AV didn't make it" Let me guess Norton Antivirus

[Tags:]