CIS 6 Fever

[Guest]

[spainach_12]

I'm not sure if that's a good idea unless Comodo can differentiate between app trying to access Comodo memory space or app trying to kill CIS process. I've seen Valve Steam trying to access CIS memory somehow. This would result in killing the Steam and quarantining. Which is not exacctly a desired result.

Besides, CIS has a huge pre-defined whitelist. And I'm very much sure they'd use the same whitelist utilized by D+ should a bb be included to manage size and resources. This should trim down fp's.

[fsan4]

Automatic sandbox with full virtualization

WebShield

Site Inspector Checks each web page in real time showing web reputation

Better Av with advanced heuristic engine

CCE and KillSwitch integrated into CIS

Makes CIS the best security in the world...  

[atomas31]

Well atleast these are talked about for quite a long time but no one knows whats all going to be there.

Virtualization
Valkyrie
Local Behaviour Blocker
DACS
Kill Switch
Site Inspector
File Rating System in Threatcast with other features

Thanxx
Naren

I will add :

Autoruns
disinfect and repair capacity (and not only deleting)
CCE

[wasgij6]

Automatic sandbox with full virtualization

WebShield

Site Inspector Checks each web page in real time showing web reputation

Better Av with advanced heuristic engine

CCE and KillSwitch integrated into CIS

Makes CIS the best security in the world...  

CCE is not being integrated into CIS only Killswitch and the advanced heuristics are in valkyrie which means the heuristics will only be used in the cloud not locally

[spainach_12]

can we prevent CIS from becoming too bloated and just, well, let's just not add anything that are redundant or can be supplemented by other products.

Autoruns, we have http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb963902, CCleaner, WinPatrol, and a bunch of others. They're portable too.

CCE and KillSwitch are for emergency purposes aren't they?? I don't see why they should be included in the suite.

If the problem primarily is for easy access that is to have them all in a single interface, I find that shortcuts do well. I just make the shortcuts, keep them in a single folder and they're good to go. If I want them clickable, I put them in the taskbar or start menu or on a dock where you can even change the icon. And they're better off as separate apps because, well, when I'm analyzing the pc for any changes made, I like to keep the windows of the applications side by side so I can check for any common factors such as dates, size, locations, etc. rather than in a single tabbed interface (a hassle to be clicking tabs several times and comparing them one by one).

Let's not make CIS too bloated. AV + FW + HIPS (or whatever D+ is) is more than enough for a security suite. Site inspector? Make it an extension and host it somewhere else. It's already in Dragon anyway.

[wasgij6]

can we prevent CIS from becoming too bloated and just, well, let's just not add anything that are redundant or can be supplemented by other products.

Autoruns, we have http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb963902, CCleaner, WinPatrol, and a bunch of others. They're portable too.

CCE and KillSwitch are for emergency purposes aren't they?? I don't see why they should be included in the suite.

If the problem primarily is for easy access that is to have them all in a single interface, I find that shortcuts do well. I just make the shortcuts, keep them in a single folder and they're good to go. If I want them clickable, I put them in the taskbar or start menu or on a dock where you can even change the icon. And they're better off as separate apps because, well, when I'm analyzing the pc for any changes made, I like to keep the windows of the applications side by side so I can check for any common factors such as dates, size, locations, etc. rather than in a single tabbed interface (a hassle to be clicking tabs several times and comparing them one by one).

Let's not make CIS too bloated. AV + FW + HIPS (or whatever D+ is) is more than enough for a security suite. Site inspector? Make it an extension and host it somewhere else. It's already in Dragon anyway.

as i said in the post right above your Melih has said many times that cce is not going to be integrated into cis. as for site inspector its going to be integrated into secure dns so all the work will be done by the comodo servers not your computer.

[fsan4]

can we prevent CIS from becoming too bloated and just, well, let's just not add anything that are redundant or can be supplemented by other products.

Autoruns, we have http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb963902, CCleaner, WinPatrol, and a bunch of others. They're portable too.

CCE and KillSwitch are for emergency purposes aren't they?? I don't see why they should be included in the suite.

If the problem primarily is for easy access that is to have them all in a single interface, I find that shortcuts do well. I just make the shortcuts, keep them in a single folder and they're good to go. If I want them clickable, I put them in the taskbar or start menu or on a dock where you can even change the icon. And they're better off as separate apps because, well, when I'm analyzing the pc for any changes made, I like to keep the windows of the applications side by side so I can check for any common factors such as dates, size, locations, etc. rather than in a single tabbed interface (a hassle to be clicking tabs several times and comparing them one by one).

Let's not make CIS too bloated. AV + FW + HIPS (or whatever D+ is) is more than enough for a security suite. Site inspector? Make it an extension and host it somewhere else. It's already in Dragon anyway.

Then to enter a page have I to inspect manually with Site Inspector? It is something very tedious, in addition I don't believe that makes CIS too bloated.
There are other very light products that Webshield has, for example Avast.
A shame is that having the best Firewall and Hips, Comodo do not pay attention to these small details.

[Melih]

can we prevent CIS from becoming too bloated and just, well, let's just not add anything that are redundant or can be supplemented by other products.

Autoruns, we have http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb963902, CCleaner, WinPatrol, and a bunch of others. They're portable too.

CCE and KillSwitch are for emergency purposes aren't they?? I don't see why they should be included in the suite.

If the problem primarily is for easy access that is to have them all in a single interface, I find that shortcuts do well. I just make the shortcuts, keep them in a single folder and they're good to go. If I want them clickable, I put them in the taskbar or start menu or on a dock where you can even change the icon. And they're better off as separate apps because, well, when I'm analyzing the pc for any changes made, I like to keep the windows of the applications side by side so I can check for any common factors such as dates, size, locations, etc. rather than in a single tabbed interface (a hassle to be clicking tabs several times and comparing them one by one).

Let's not make CIS too bloated. AV + FW + HIPS (or whatever D+ is) is more than enough for a security suite. Site inspector? Make it an extension and host it somewhere else. It's already in Dragon anyway.

You know I wholeheartedly agree with you! That is exactly what I have been saying all along, but a lot of people want CCE included in CIS

[M.Richter]

Buy and integrate  Pc Tools ThreatFire as BB, par excample for analize the behaviour of sandboxed Files 

tested it here on my System and it works great

and i think Comodo Group will much more and faster develope ThreatFire than Pc Tools

^^ only dreaming 

[Melih]

Buy and integrate  Pc Tools ThreatFire as BB, par excample for analize the behaviour of sandboxed Files 

tested it here on my System and it works great

and i think Comodo Group will much more and faster develope ThreatFire than Pc Tools

^^ only dreaming 

Our local Behaviour Blocker is working already on Egemen's machine ...He has built an amazing Architecture for a very flexible and powerful Behaviour blocker....watch this space...

[ArtemisF0wl]

   sounds exciting, Melih

[M.Richter]

Our local Behaviour Blocker is working already on Egemen's machine ...He has built an amazing Architecture for a very flexible and powerful Behaviour blocker....watch this space...

thank you for response Melih... i am courious and excited to see more ;-)

maybe egemen can already give more info´s to us!?

[Siketa]

Buy and integrate  Pc Tools ThreatFire as BB, par excample for analize the behaviour of sandboxed Files 

tested it here on my System and it works great

and i think Comodo Group will much more and faster develope ThreatFire than Pc Tools

^^ only dreaming 

AFAIK, Symantec has already bought PC Tools. 

http://www.symantec.com/about/news/release/article.jsp?prid=20080818_02

[wasgij6]

Our local Behaviour Blocker is working already on Egemen's machine ...He has built an amazing Architecture for a very flexible and powerful Behaviour blocker....watch this space...

thats amazing news. great to hear
cant wait to see it

[atomas31]

Our local Behaviour Blocker is working already on Egemen's machine ...He has built an amazing Architecture for a very flexible and powerful Behaviour blocker....watch this space...

Seems interesting! How does it compare to Threatfire and Mamutu?

[Tags:]