Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2013, 05:10:12 AM

Login with username, password and session length

669249 Posts
71156 Topics
145754 Members

Latest Member: Darkrogue

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Security Products & Services
| |-+  Comodo Dragon - CD
| | |-+  News / Announcements / Feedback - CD
| | | |-+  Browserscope security test - Chrome beats CD
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Browserscope security test - Chrome beats CD  (Read 8101 times)
Sal Amander
Comodo Staff
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 610



WWW
Re: Browserscope security test - Chrome beats CD
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2012, 01:21:43 PM »

While I am not directly involved in the CD project, I did open a ticket with our developers and QA teams so that we may do our own investigation on HTTP Strict Transport Security inside Comodo Dragon.
Logged
n01paranoid
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 51


Re: Browserscope security test - Chrome beats CD
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2012, 04:34:57 AM »

CD fails most likely due to a bug within whomever created the test. You may want to inquire with them for resolution.

I am rather surprised with this apparently complacent attitude. If you believe CD is failing the test through no fault of Comodo but because of a Browserscope bug do you not feel the need for Comodo also to contact them and find out why? If I worked for Comodo I certainly wouldn't be happy.
Logged
Sal Amander
Comodo Staff
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 610



WWW
Re: Browserscope security test - Chrome beats CD
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2012, 08:13:30 AM »

I am rather surprised with this apparently complacent attitude. If you believe CD is failing the test through no fault of Comodo but because of a Browserscope bug do you not feel the need for Comodo also to contact them and find out why? If I worked for Comodo I certainly wouldn't be happy.

Dragon doesn't fail my tests for HSTS but rather BrowserScope's own. It's not the job of a random Comodo employee to file suspected bugs with other software that he/she did not find themselves nor was able to reproduce outside of BrowserScope's test (a test I've never heard of until this thread). The job should lie with the user that first reported the possible issue.
Logged
Tags:
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Certificate Free Virus Removal Firewall
Page created in 0.04 seconds with 22 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines Design by 7dana.com