I'm glad the truth is finally shown about AV Comparatives, I believe a lot more people will start to fade away from depending on AV Comparatives Test Results because They can't test the whole product of CIS 5.8 due to the "Sandboxing Patent Feature".. and they tried to blackmail Comodo just because of Free Speech and Opinions about them? Heck, I would love to have any and all feedback, They just couldn't handle bad feedback i guess.. and if they can't handle bad feedback then how will they ever improve their services?
Comodo don't censor our posts, Comodo don't delete posts even when it's bad feedback about Comodo.
And that is the key:
They can't test our product, hence don't include it, but insuniate that only the good AVs are tested. all this while Andreas said:
btw, do not be unhappy about the „other malware/viruses“ %s, you will see in the report that also other vendors score low there (mainly because that category contains non-PE malware). Furthermore, your ~90% is higher than what some few other products scored and similar to what other well-known products reached. You will see
What that means is all the PE based malware (the trojans, viruses, spyware, rootkits etc) is detected well by Comodo and according to Andreas: "higher than what some few other products scored and similar to what other well-known products reached"