Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 12, 2008, 10:45:33 PM

Login with username, password and session length

199786 Posts
22932 Topics
55032 Members

Latest Member: noebro

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Desktop Security Products
| |-+  Comodo Firewall
| | |-+  Leak Testing/Attacks/Vulnerability Research
| | | |-+  Teredo IPv6 traffic (New protocol used by Vista) : vulnerable to IPv6 masking?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Teredo IPv6 traffic (New protocol used by Vista) : vulnerable to IPv6 masking?  (Read 1085 times)
freshhh
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 58


« on: May 03, 2008, 02:35:26 PM »


Why Teredo blocking is important

All Windows Vista machines come with a service known as "Teredo" enabled by default. This enables you to access the IPv6 internet using IPv4. It also means that any IPv4 user can masquerade as being on IPv6 in attempt to evade IP blockers and firewalls.

PeerGuardian fully detects these types of IPv6 users and will check them against the regular blocklist.



IPv6 protocol used by Vista

6to4, the most common IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling protocol, requires the tunnel endpoint to have a public IPv4 address. However, many hosts are currently attached to the IPv4 Internet through one or several NAT devices, usually because of IPv4 address shortage. In such a situation, the only available public IPv4 address is assigned to the NAT device, and the 6to4 tunnel endpoint needs to be implemented on the NAT device itself. Many NAT devices currently deployed, however, cannot be upgraded to implement 6to4, for technical or economic reasons.

Teredo alleviates this problem by encapsulating IPv6 packets within UDP/IPv4 datagrams, which most NATs can forward properly. Thus, IPv6-aware hosts behind NATs can be used as Teredo tunnel endpoints even when they don't have a dedicated public IPv4 address. In effect, a host implementing Teredo can gain IPv6 connectivity with no cooperation from the local network environment.

Teredo is a temporary measure: in the long term, all IPv6 hosts should use native IPv6 connectivity. The Teredo protocol includes provisions for a sunset procedure: Teredo implementation should provide a way to stop using Teredo connectivity when IPv6 has matured and connectivity becomes available using a less brittle mechanism.

Source : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teredo_tunneling
(follow the link to read more)



Teredo may render your firewall useless

You most certainly know IPV4. You may have heard about IPV6. Do you know what Teredo is? No? That's bad provided you run a firewall to seperate the Internet from your local network. Teredo is a mechanism that allows encapsulation of IPV6 packets into IPV4 UDP and uses relay servers to let IPV6 clients communicate by using relay servers. Symantec has a very thorough analysis of Teredo:

Currently hardly any firewalls or intrusion detection systems are able to recognise Teredo packets and they are therefore unable to filter IPv6 traffic. Rather they see UDP traffic via any ports. Teredo could become a problem, in particular because it circumvents the supposed protection offered by NAT. While, to date, private IPv4 addresses have not been routed via the internet, with IPv6 every computer is automatically assigned a unique IPv6 address, into which goes, for example, the MAC address of the network card and which is in principle accessible from the internet.

Source : http://web.luchs.at/article.php?cat=2&aid=298
Logged
AeoniAn
Comodo Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 49


COMODO is the BEST, I'm safe and happy.


« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2008, 01:37:36 AM »

BUMP!
A serious problem. Almost a month ago...  Hmmm... Comodo people are taking care about?  Is CFP v3 able to "understand and see" the whole possibilities of Teredo?  Do we still are in need of PG2?
Please...
Logged

CIS v3.5 RC1 32bits, FW in Custom Policy Mode, D+ in Paranoid mode, AV not installed.
Sempron 3000+, MB MSI-7145, 1GB RAM
WinXP-Pro-BR SP3 32bits full-updated
NOD32 v3 back to v2.70.39, PG2-RC1-test2-2, no other security app
Zero, Nada, No-one single infecction for 27 months.
Pedro*
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 794


« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2008, 09:10:10 AM »

I have faith that Egemen in all his wisdom will attend to the firewall proper.

Right now i see a lot of focus on Defense+, most people discussing D+, so i really don't have a clue. It's keylogger this, safe files that.
Tongue
Logged
freshhh
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 58


« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2008, 10:16:14 AM »


Still waiting for comments from Comodo team...
Logged
Tags: Teredo  IPv6  IP6  vista  protocol  masking  peerguardian  PG 
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Firewall
Page created in 0.144 seconds with 19 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com