Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 07, 2009, 03:54:14 PM

Login with username, password and session length

333149 Posts
36817 Topics
83454 Members

Latest Member: sergei-nemec76

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Desktop Security Products
| |-+  Comodo Internet Security - CIS
| | |-+  Leak Testing/Attacks/Vulnerability Research
| | | |-+  COMODO Leak Test Suite Updated Version
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Down Print
Author Topic: COMODO Leak Test Suite Updated Version  (Read 19667 times)
larlyles
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 344


« Reply #30 on: November 24, 2008, 12:08:48 AM »

I know this is a Comodo designed test and that Defense+ is an integral part of CIS, but by relying so much on Defense+, is the leak test suite really testing the CIS Firewall? It seems like the HIPS part of CIS is doing most of the work in these leak tests. By choosing 'Allow', aren't you bypassing the Defense+ part of CIS and then testing only the Firewall part of the program, which gives the CIS Firewall a much lower score? Is this a convoluted way of looking at this leak test suite in regards to the CIS program, or does the question have merit?

BTW, I scored 340 out of 340, with the Firewall and Defense+ set to Safe Mode and all the Monitor Settings checked. The Advanced Predefined Security Policies Trusted Applications Protection Settings were all set to 'Yes'. The Windows System Applications Protection Settings were all set to 'Yes', except Windows/WinEvent Hooks was left at "No'. Isolated Applications Protection Settings were all left at 'No', and the Limited Applications were all set to 'Yes'. With these settings I didn't get any Defense+ popups to answer. I still have to wonder, was the CIS Firewall really being tested by this leak test suite, or was Defense+ doing most of the work because of the advanced settings chosen?
Logged
prandi63
Computer Security Testing Group
Comodo Family Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 74


« Reply #31 on: November 24, 2008, 01:40:05 AM »

Hye,
i got today,after a click on D+ computer security policy under ''treat as'' a deeper menu as ''access rights'' and ''protection setting'' i put all in blocked(both menu) and i got 340/340 but no internet page shown.
Closed it and set clt in trusted app then i try again program got again message select installer and update and i got again 30/340
Changing again in custom and i got again 340/340
Is that right???
I think test like this it is not good ,otherwise i have to block all programs and then maybe i got pc blocked
I get confusing

prandi63
Logged
ganda
ninja
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5450


temporary avatar


« Reply #32 on: November 24, 2008, 02:00:03 AM »

Hye,
i got today,after a click on D+ computer security policy under ''treat as'' a deeper menu as ''access rights'' and ''protection setting'' i put all in blocked(both menu) and i got 340/340 but no internet page shown.
Closed it and set clt in trusted app then i try again program got again message select installer and update and i got again 30/340
Changing again in custom and i got again 340/340
Is that right???
I think test like this it is not good ,otherwise i have to block all programs and then maybe i got pc blocked
I get confusing

prandi63
huh Huh errr,what's the point of creating rule for CLT?
i think you should assume the CLT as a new unknown application.
and then you run it, and see how CIS handle it,and when the popup shows up, you answer accordingly.  Tongue
Logged

word of wisdom: it's not cheating unless you get caught
easter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #33 on: November 24, 2008, 02:14:22 AM »

Hello Comodo folks and staff

FYI i tried the new CLT Test and am very happy to report that EQS Beta3 w/ Alcyon's Crushing Rulesets blowed this test out of the water.

In conjunction with PG 3.5 & MAMUTU only as well as my little Kerio 2.15 firewall.

Can you come up with a more strenous test in the future? These are interesting.

Thanks EASTER
Logged
naren
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 359


« Reply #34 on: November 25, 2008, 03:22:26 AM »

I know this is a Comodo designed test and that Defense+ is an integral part of CIS, but by relying so much on Defense+, is the leak test suite really testing the CIS Firewall? It seems like the HIPS part of CIS is doing most of the work in these leak tests. By choosing 'Allow', aren't you bypassing the Defense+ part of CIS and then testing only the Firewall part of the program, which gives the CIS Firewall a much lower score? Is this a convoluted way of looking at this leak test suite in regards to the CIS program, or does the question have merit?

BTW, I scored 340 out of 340, with the Firewall and Defense+ set to Safe Mode and all the Monitor Settings checked. The Advanced Predefined Security Policies Trusted Applications Protection Settings were all set to 'Yes'. The Windows System Applications Protection Settings were all set to 'Yes', except Windows/WinEvent Hooks was left at "No'. Isolated Applications Protection Settings were all left at 'No', and the Limited Applications were all set to 'Yes'. With these settings I didn't get any Defense+ popups to answer. I still have to wonder, was the CIS Firewall really being tested by this leak test suite, or was Defense+ doing most of the work because of the advanced settings chosen?


hii. a good point buddy. some leak tests are meant for firewall and some are meant for hips and some for both. so if we disable defence plus and run the tests the firewall should atleast generate the pop ups for the tests meant for firewall tests. but i dont know if there are leak tests meant for firewall only in comodo leak tests.

thanxx

naren
Logged
HazardHacx
Malware Research Group
Comodo Family Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 56


Ready to be Owned?


« Reply #35 on: March 06, 2009, 08:41:08 PM »

170/340

All i have on my computer is Spybot Search & Destroy  Tongue Tongue Tongue
Logged

Call Of Duty 5: World At War Red Army
Zombie Map Pack 2: Survived Till Round 13
Hell Hounds suck......
mjj09
Comodo Loves me
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 192


« Reply #36 on: March 07, 2009, 12:55:55 AM »

XP SP3 in Safe Mode

340/340
Logged
Graham1
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 877



« Reply #37 on: May 14, 2009, 06:50:44 AM »

Hi

Any news when this "online type" leak test suite will be available?

Smiley
Logged
Graham1
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 877



« Reply #38 on: September 15, 2009, 02:41:57 AM »

Any news when this "online type" leak test suite will be available?

Bump Wink.

Smiley
Logged
7testing
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #39 on: September 27, 2009, 10:17:03 PM »

thanks. you are a  gentleman.
Logged
devenroy
Malware Research Group
Comodo's Hero
*****
Online Online

Posts: 381



« Reply #40 on: September 28, 2009, 09:05:11 AM »

Hi all,
I m running windows 7 x 64bit edition.
I have CIS & Iobit security 360 installed on my system
After running test i found "Impersonation: DDE Vulnerable"
How can i fix this?
My total score is 330/340.
Logged

Thanks,
Deven
JoWa
Product Translator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 775



« Reply #41 on: October 15, 2009, 04:25:20 PM »

Like some AVs, IE8 doesn't like CLT. Roll Eyes
Logged

Windows XP Pro SP3 | CIS 3.12.111745.560 | CSC 2.1.114194.1 | CSE 2.3.0.258 Beta | MSI 865PE Neo2-FIS2R | Pentium 4 HT 3,4 GHz | 4×1 GB RAM | SATA: 300 GB, IDE: 75 + 150 GB | ATI Radeon 9800 Pro
Tags:
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Certificate Free Virus Removal Firewall
Page created in -0 seconds with 22 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com