Welcome to the Comodo Forum
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
October 10, 2008, 09:48:51 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
199098
Posts
22882
Topics
54912
Members
Latest Member:
catstoluv
more news...
Search:
Advanced search
|
Tag Cloud
Welcome to the Comodo Forum
Desktop Security Products
Comodo Firewall
Leak Testing/Attacks/Vulnerability Research
A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test (Read 8963 times)
egemen
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 1737
A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
on:
January 25, 2008, 04:57:10 PM »
Hi Guys,
Here is another BASIC outbound protection filtering test for testing firewalling functionality. It tests data transfer over ICMP and a firewall's reaction to it. Any average firewall should pass these basic ones though there are still many which cant.
Egemen
«
Last Edit: January 25, 2008, 05:11:42 PM by Melih
»
Logged
Ragwing
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 3114
Sailor Warrior of Love and Justice
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #1 on:
January 25, 2008, 05:20:57 PM »
Downloaded and ran it. CFP 3 passed it, but my hardware firewall failed it, so now we got another reason to use CFP
Logged
XP SP3
2 GHz
768 MB RAM
5 services / 12 processes
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 5677
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #2 on:
January 25, 2008, 05:29:55 PM »
Indeed!
this is a basic test that any decent firewall should be able pass.
Melih
Logged
Visit Melih's Blog
Ragwing
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 3114
Sailor Warrior of Love and Justice
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #3 on:
January 25, 2008, 05:36:39 PM »
Just want to add one thing. Disabling all ICMP-traffic with IPSec will make you pass the test.
With CFP you get Error: icmpEcho Status=11010, but with IPSec, you get Error: icmpEcho Status=11003.
What's the difference between 11010 and 11003?
Logged
XP SP3
2 GHz
768 MB RAM
5 services / 12 processes
Josh123
Guest
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #4 on:
January 26, 2008, 12:01:58 AM »
Considering I have Defense+, The "Firewall" alert did pop up, and I passed all tests.
Josh.
Logged
Soyabeaner
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 7438
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #5 on:
January 26, 2008, 12:07:51 AM »
Considering I allowed a lot of outgoing
ICMP connection rules
(for uTorrent), I still passed
«
Last Edit: January 26, 2008, 12:12:15 AM by Soyabeaner
»
Logged
Leopard19
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 336
aka apache255
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #6 on:
January 27, 2008, 07:39:00 AM »
same good results here: first alert from Def+, I allow it, and then an alert from the firewall itself. Also in my case when I disable CFP, the router firewall doesn't pass the test.
By the way it's not the first time I notice that: when I allow or block something from Def+ or the firewall
without checking the remember box, things are being remembered for the Windows Session
. Like for that test, I didn't check remember and the ICMP traffic from it keeps being blocked with no alert, starting with the second test.
«
Last Edit: January 27, 2008, 07:42:07 AM by Leopard19
»
Logged
Soyabeaner
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 7438
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #7 on:
January 27, 2008, 10:46:57 AM »
Actually, I found it wasn't for the logon session. I restarted the app and CFP alerted again.
Logged
Little Mac
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 6017
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #8 on:
January 29, 2008, 06:00:56 PM »
hey, if I can pass this test with v3 installed in Basic (ie, no D+) by blocking the executable trying to connect to the internet, how is there no outbound protection?
LM
Logged
date
dcfldd split=2G conv=noerror hashwindow=0 hash=md5 bs=32768 hashlog=/mnt/sda1/images/hash.log if=/dev/hda of=/mnt/sda1/images/LM.dd
date
cat LM.dd.* | md5sum > verify.log
date
Leopard19
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 336
aka apache255
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #9 on:
January 29, 2008, 06:11:01 PM »
Quote from: Little Mac on January 29, 2008, 06:00:56 PM
hey, if I can pass this test with v3 installed in Basic (ie, no D+) by blocking the executable trying to connect to the internet, how is there no outbound protection?
LM
same here, as i said in my post above, I allowed the process with Def+, and still got an alert from the firewall. Good news for those guys down there at Scott's newsletter!
(also wanted to let you know I posted something there tonight:
http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/01/22/comodos-ceo-attacks-scots-newsletter-product-decision/#comment-306
)
«
Last Edit: January 29, 2008, 06:16:06 PM by Leopard19
»
Logged
egemen
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 1737
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #10 on:
January 29, 2008, 10:49:57 PM »
Quote from: Little Mac on January 29, 2008, 06:00:56 PM
hey, if I can pass this test with v3 installed in Basic (ie, no D+) by blocking the executable trying to connect to the internet, how is there no outbound protection?
LM
FYI:
That "so called recommended firewall" was failing this basic test in its most advanced mode. You can test yourself if they havent fixed yet. And people still compare it with CFP 3...
Egemen
Logged
ggf31416
Comodo Loves me
Offline
Posts: 108
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #11 on:
January 30, 2008, 05:08:47 PM »
The reason many firewall have poor outbound protection for ICMP is that is rarely used to leak data.
Comodo should make a leaktest that sends data (a short string written by the user) using pings (e.g. using 16 different sizes of ping, each one representing 4 bits) to a comodo server with software able to decode the pings and show the strings in a website.
Logged
egemen
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 1737
Re: A New-Simple Outbound Protection Test
«
Reply #12 on:
January 30, 2008, 08:05:04 PM »
Quote from: ggf31416 on January 30, 2008, 05:08:47 PM
The reason many firewall have poor outbound protection for ICMP is that is rarely used to leak data.
Comodo should make a leaktest that sends data (a short string written by the user) using pings (e.g. using 16 different sizes of ping, each one representing 4 bits) to a comodo server with software able to decode the pings and show the strings in a website.
Here is a trojan that LEAKS data(personal information) over ICMP:
http://www.websense.com/securitylabs/alerts/alert.php?AlertID=570
Never mind leaking data, there are various DDoS Attacks Tools that use ICMP protocol. It is not just leaking the data. A User's computer can be a zomby and his firewall may not be detecting this at all... Another example:
http://ca.com/us/securityadvisor/pest/pest.aspx?id=2776
I dont think most firewalls would fail this test. At least the decent ones... It is as basic as grc.com leaktest...
Egemen
Logged
hbobeck
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 203
Re: "My Router has a built in Firewall, don't need a software firewall!" Stories
«
Reply #13 on:
February 06, 2008, 07:15:22 AM »
hmmm
For some strange reason CFP 3.0.16.295 does not pass the ICMP2-test!!!
"Your firewall has FAILED the test"
ICMP1-test passed...
I'm confused!
Harry
Logged
Soyabeaner
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 7438
Re: "My Router has a built in Firewall, don't need a software firewall!" Stories
«
Reply #14 on:
February 06, 2008, 11:04:11 AM »
Harry, did you answer No to the firewall alert?
Also, this is the incorrect thread to be posting about leak testing, so I'll be moving your and my post to the appropriate one. [Done]
«
Last Edit: February 06, 2008, 11:09:53 AM by Soyabeaner
»
Logged
Tags:
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
** New to the Comodo Forum? Start Here! **
-----------------------------
=> New Member Information
-----------------------------
Want to help Comodo?
-----------------------------
=> Help Spread the Word - Official Comodo banners and logos
=> How can you help Comodo? (Please we do need you!)
===> Help spread the word! (Please read and help)
===> Comodo website issues for submitting website problems only
=> Please tell us your views and Vote here!
-----------------------------
General Category
-----------------------------
=> Melih's Corner - CEO Talk/Discussions/Blog
=> Which Product do you want Comodo to develop next?
=> General Discussion (off topic) Anything and everything...
===> Member Confessions :-)
===> Funny Photos :-)
===> Cool Stuff
-----------------------------
Desktop Security Products
-----------------------------
=> Comodo Firewall
===> Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News
===> Leak Testing/Attacks/Vulnerability Research
===> Help for v3
===> Help for v2
===> Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Comodo firewall
===> Comodo Firewall Translations
===> Bug Reports
=> Comodo Internet Security - CIS
===> Overview - CIS
===> Help - CIS
=====> Anti Virus Help
=====> Firewall Help
=====> Defense+ Help
=====> Install / Setup / Configuration Help
===> FAQ - CIS
=====> Anti Virus FAQ
=====> Firewall FAQ
=====> Defense+ FAQ
=====> Install / Setup / Configuration FAQ
===> Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News - CIS
===> Guides - CIS
=====> Anti Virus Guides
=====> Firewall Guides
=====> Defense+ Guides
=====> Install / Setup / Configuration Guides
===> Wishlist - CIS
=====> Anti Virus Wishlist
=====> Firewall Wishlist
=====> Defense+ Wishlist
=====> GUI -Graphical User Interface - Wishlist
===> Bug Report - CIS
=====> Anti Virus Bugs
=====> Firewall Bugs
=====> Defense+ Bugs
=====> Other - General - GUI etc Bugs
=====> False Positive/Negative reporting - (Is this a malware that CIS has/not detected?)
=> Comodo Anti-Viruspyware (CAVS)
===> Help for Comodo AntiVirus
===> FAQ for Comodo Anti-ViruSpyware
===> Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News about CAVS
===> Virus/Malware Removal Assistance
=> Comodo BOClean Anti-Malware
===> Announcements
===> Comodo BOClean Anti-Malware FAQ
=> Comodo Instant Malware Analysis - Online (CIMA)
=> Comodo DiskShield
=> Comodo Disk Encryption
=> Comodo Secure Email (CSE) Product
===> Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
===> Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News about CSE
===> Bug Reports
===> Help for Comodo SecureEmail
=> Comodo Memory Firewall(Buffer Overflow Protection)
===> Help
===> Frequently Asked Questions (Comodo Memory Firewall)
===> Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News
=> Comodo TrustConnect - Securing the Wireless world!
=> Comodo SafeSurf and (Comodo's own toolbar)
=> Backup
===> FAQ for Comodo Backup
===> Help
=> Verification Engine (allows you to verify what you see on the Internet)
=> Comodo Vulnerability Analyzer
=> AntiSpam
=> i-Vault
=> Launch Pad
=> Trusttoolbar
-----------------------------
Desktop Utilities
-----------------------------
=> Comodo Registry Cleaner
-----------------------------
Enterprise Security
-----------------------------
=> Comodo Endpoint Security Manager
-----------------------------
Compliance
-----------------------------
=> PCI DSS Compliance
-----------------------------
Learn about Computer Security and Interact with Security Experts
-----------------------------
=> Computer Firewalls
=> Anti Virus/Malware Products/Other Security products
=> Free Virus/Spyware/Trojan/Malware Removal by Comodo Experts
=> HIPS (Host Intrusion Prevention Systems)
=> Anti Phishing solutions
=> Digital Certificates, Encryption and Digital Signing
=> General Security Questions and Comments (not product related)
-----------------------------
Free Services for End Users
-----------------------------
=> UserTrust - First Independent Website Rating - Empowering our users!
=> User Anywhere (Remote Access product)
=> Comodo Meet (Web Conferencing Product)
=> Hacker Guardian
=> Trustfax (free Trial) (online faxing)
-----------------------------
Free Products
-----------------------------
=> Link to Free Comodo Products
-----------------------------
International Comodo Forums
-----------------------------
=> International Comodo Forums
===> 汉语语言, 漢語語言 / Chinese Simplified, Traditional
===> Nederlands / Dutch
===> Francais / French
===> Deutsch / German
===> ελληνικά / Greek
===> Magyar / Hungarian
===> Italiano / Italian
===> Nihongo / Japanese
===> Norsk / Norwegian
===> Polski / Polish
===> Português/Portuguese
===> По-русски / Russian
===> Espanol / Spanish
===> Svenska / Swedish
===> Turkce / Turkish
===> Українська / Ukrainian
===> tiếng Việt / Vietnamese
-----------------------------
Digital Certificates
-----------------------------
=> Code Signing Certificate
=> Content Verification Certificate
=> Email Certificate
=> SSL Certificate
-----------------------------
Web Server Products
-----------------------------
=> Two Factor Authentication for Web Applications
=> Trustlogo
-----------------------------
Infrastructure Products
-----------------------------
=> ZTL
=> Trustix Enterprise Firewall
-----------------------------
Other
-----------------------------
=> Forum Policy Violation Board
Page created in 0.398 seconds with 20 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.5
|
SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by
7dana.com