About Comodo 2.0 version

[Guest]

[pandlouk]

Wow compared to you guys I have a really tiny amount of posts

Hi justin

Hehe. Just follow the example of panic.

Reply lots of times to yourself :

ps. Melih I was just kidding (I don't want to be banned :  )

[Melih]

Hi justin

Hehe. Just follow the example of panic.

Reply lots of times to yourself :

ps. Melih I was just kidding (I don't want to be banned :  )

oh well, too late pandlouk..

:-)

Melih

[m0ng0d]

Hi justin

Hehe. Just follow the example of panic.

Reply lots of times to yourself :

ps. Melih I was just kidding (I don't want to be banned :  )

I think I'll have... Spam, Spam, Sausages & Spam

[Melih]

oh well, too late pandlouk..

:-)

Melih

Pandlouk

I hope you did not take this seriously :-)
it was a joke :-)

Melih

[egemen]

Wow compared to you guys I have a really tiny amount of posts

Welcome to the club justin I dont have as many posts as Ewen either:)

[Júštiñ™]

Welcome to the club justin I dont have as many posts as Ewen either:)

My goal is to catch up to Melih, of course I doubt I can do that he spends to much time here with us

[m0ng0d]

I think I'll have... Spam, Spam, Sausages & Spam

Me... I'm just going for quality!!!  :

[pandlouk]

Pandlouk

I hope you did not take this seriously :-)
it was a joke :-)

Melih

  Don't worry,I didn't. I just didn't have much time yesterday to write.

[egemen]

Hi justin

Hehe. Just follow the example of panic.

Reply lots of times to yourself :

ps. Melih I was just kidding (I don't want to be banned :  )

LOL!

[TheFireKnight]

Me... I'm just going for quality!!!  :

+1

But let me get this thread back on topic... 

CAVS version 2.0 will of course work with Vista RTM right?

Edward

[m0ng0d]

CAVS version 2.0 will of course work with Vista RTM right?

Edward

Based on what I think I've heard (can you sense the confidence?), Vista versions will most likely have release dates in 2007.

I just did a quick search and see that the question has perviously been asked here and here... and luckily (for my sanity sake) they concure with my 2007 thought.

Well the Project Leader for CAV has been off for last 3 weeks busy getting married and going on his honeymoon! :-)

He will be back next week, hopefully then we will be able to give you a timeline. :-)

Melih

Any news is welcome.  Many thanks in advance 
 

[Ryan]

Based on what I think I've heard (can you sense the confidence?), Vista versions will most likely have release dates in 2007.

I just did a quick search and see that the question has perviously been asked here and here... and luckily (for my sanity sake) they concure with my 2007 thought.

Any news is welcome.  Many thanks in advance 
 

Yep, I'd like an idea as well. I'm looking forward to getting my email scanned again 

 

[m0ng0d]

Yep, I'd like an idea as well. I'm looking forward to getting my email scanned again 

 

Yes, my Outlook 2003 and CAV took long walks on the beach together while I sat there waiting for mail to come in.  Maybe the fact I typically let 200-400 e-mails queue up on my ISP's server had something to do with it (I use MailWasher to browse what's sitting out there)

It was odd how the CavAUD.exe would to pin my system in spurts while playing LAN games... I'm hoping the new "Updater" update (today or yesterday [it's all a blur after a days work]) fixed that.... Or wait, that was the "Program Updates Version" that increased... not updater... hence prob nothing to do with CavAUD.exe... oh well (let's just call this paragraph a "bridge to nowhere")

I've actually decided to try another full systems scan in CAV today... Maybe absense makes the heart grow fonder, but CAV 1.1 feels alot snappier now... and of course as I typed that and looked over at the scan progress, it's "stopped updating the file/folder counts" as it has reached a folder with 28 zip/rar files totalling 130Mb.  I don't think CAV "hangs" on folders, just doesn't share the progress as it rips through big archive files / collections... Ah, might be speaking too soon again... it is on this same folder that CavSn.exe almost hits 100% CPU, where are the rest of the time it was down around 20%, with the odd spike as high as 60%.

At any rate, I'm going to test CAV/Outlook again today and post back my results.  Maybe with all these updates, CAV 1.1 is coming into its own in spite of CAV 2.0 being on the horizon.

[m0ng0d]

Yes... 'twas wishful thinking Ryan.  Same issues as before.

But at least I've made 2 observations on CAV 1.1:

• I don't think CAV "hangs" on folders, just doesn't share the progress as it rips through big archive files / collections.
• e-mail scanning is slow with Outlook 2003.  If all e-mails were under 2K, I could get by, but sometimes the delay while processing an e-mail as small as 40K is enough to trip a timeout.

My hopes for Cav 2.0 have been renewed.
 

[Ryan]

Yes... 'twas wishful thinking Ryan.  Same issues as before.

But at least I've made 2 observations on CAV 1.1:

• I don't think CAV "hangs" on folders, just doesn't share the progress as it rips through big archive files / collections.
• e-mail scanning is slow with Outlook 2003.  If all e-mails were under 2K, I could get by, but sometimes the delay while processing an e-mail as small as 40K is enough to trip a timeout.

My hopes for Cav 2.0 have been renewed.

Yes, I was hoping that it would be available upon my return but I'll wait. I know it will be worth it. I've got 160 work from home employees that I'd love to recommend it too. 

[Tags:]