* Home Help Search Login Register  

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 12, 2008, 02:54:45 AM

Login with username, password and session length

199517 Posts
22909 Topics
54982 Members
Latest Member: Rajmund Olszówka

more news...
Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Learn about Computer Security and Interact with Security Experts
| |-+  General Security Questions and Comments (not product related)
| | |-+  New tests for making sure firewall is good...		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: New tests for making sure firewall is good...  (Read 3246 times)
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5686



WWW
« on: January 25, 2008, 08:53:07 PM »
http://forums.comodo.com/leak_testingattacksvulnerability_research/a_newsimple_outbound_protection_test-t18780.0.html


Some basic tests..

let us know your feedback pls.. no matter what firewally you use or don't use, run this test and see how secure you are.

Melih
Logged
Visit Melih's Blog
ganda
Forum Ninja
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3165


Hadouken!
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2008, 11:24:25 AM »
 Thumb Up CFP3 pass both of them
Logged
Current Goals;
* get a new piggy doll
* become a superhero
* raise my level to 45
* learn lightning base magic
* **** Angry
Soyabeaner
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7455
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2008, 12:43:15 PM »
It is such a simple that Security Expert Examiner Ganda passed them Thumb Up
Logged
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5686



WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2008, 05:26:28 PM »
Quote from: Soyabeaner on January 26, 2008, 12:43:15 PM
It is such a simple that Security Expert Examiner Ganda passed them Thumb Up

welldone to ganda!

But you would be surprised how many other firewalls wouldn't pass it!

Melih
Logged
Visit Melih's Blog
Ragwing
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3115


Sailor Warrior of Love and Justice
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2008, 05:45:06 PM »
I pass both tests with Comodo Firewall Pro 3, and without any firewall at all  Kewl
Logged


XP SP3 2 GHz 768 MB RAM
5 services / 12 processes
Ravenheart
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 54
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2008, 02:45:23 AM »
I fail with CFP 2.4.18.184, whatever IP I use. What can this mean?

I even reinstalled. I have a pretty standard installation with trusted zone rules and a couple of rules allowing outgoing ICMP Port Unreachable messages to DNS servers (but it fails even without them).

I have version 2 for sake of Windows 2000.
Logged
ganda
Forum Ninja
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3165


Hadouken!
« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2008, 07:59:22 AM »
Quote from: Ragwing on January 26, 2008, 05:45:06 PM
I pass both tests with Comodo Firewall Pro 3, and without any firewall at all  Kewl
huh Huh how Huh
Logged
Current Goals;
* get a new piggy doll
* become a superhero
* raise my level to 45
* learn lightning base magic
* **** Angry
Soyabeaner
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7455
« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2008, 10:14:22 AM »
Quote from: ganda on January 29, 2008, 07:59:22 AM
huh Huh how Huh

For shame Angry.  You didn't read the thread that Melih linked above?
Logged
Ragwing
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3115


Sailor Warrior of Love and Justice
« Reply #8 on: January 29, 2008, 12:23:43 PM »
Quote from: ganda on January 29, 2008, 07:59:22 AM
huh Huh how Huh

Well, to explain it again, I used IPsec to block all ICMP traffic Wink
Else, here is my original answer Wink
Logged


XP SP3 2 GHz 768 MB RAM
5 services / 12 processes
ganda
Forum Ninja
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3165


Hadouken!
« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2008, 09:24:39 PM »
Quote from: Soyabeaner on January 29, 2008, 10:14:22 AM
For shame Angry.  You didn't read the thread that Melih linked above?
Tongue nah, i only downloaded the leaktest. 
Cheers cheers to CFP3
Logged
Current Goals;
* get a new piggy doll
* become a superhero
* raise my level to 45
* learn lightning base magic
* **** Angry
ajrb69
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


I wasted time, and now doth time waste me.
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2008, 05:05:18 AM »
I tested twice and CFP3 failed ICMP1 and ICMP2 each time. Result showed bypass from my IP.  What could be the reason for this? I use Time-Warner (RoadRunner).

Also: I did a diagnostic to check the integrity of the installation. Report said I have conflicting software, Outpost Firewall. I had tried this firewall in the past, but uninstalled it. I did a full system search (including hidden) for any files from Outpost, found none. Why does CFP3 detect this if a system search does not? How do I solve the problem, or is it a problem?
Logged
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.
Info-Sec
Computer Security Testing Group
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 557
« Reply #11 on: March 23, 2008, 01:59:31 AM »
Quote from: ajrb69 on March 22, 2008, 05:05:18 AM
I tested twice and CFP3 failed ICMP1 and ICMP2 each time. Result showed bypass from my IP.  What could be the reason for this? I use Time-Warner (RoadRunner).

Also: I did a diagnostic to check the integrity of the installation. Report said I have conflicting software, Outpost Firewall. I had tried this firewall in the past, but uninstalled it. I did a full system search (including hidden) for any files from Outpost, found none. Why does CFP3 detect this if a system search does not? How do I solve the problem, or is it a problem?

If you can verify outpost has been uninstalled (which it has) then a registry entry must have been left behind.  Don't worry if you dont experience any issues a few registry entries were left behind.
Logged
*Vista *CFP V3 *Avira * Avast *Spyware Doctor
*XP *Zone Alarm PRO *NOD32 V2.7 *Spysweeper
ajrb69
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


I wasted time, and now doth time waste me.
« Reply #12 on: March 24, 2008, 05:03:41 AM »
Quote from: Info-Sec on March 23, 2008, 01:59:31 AM
If you can verify outpost has been uninstalled (which it has) then a registry entry must have been left behind.  Don't worry if you dont experience any issues a few registry entries were left behind.
Thanks, but that still does not clue me to why Comodo fails the integrity tests.
Logged
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.
Info-Sec
Computer Security Testing Group
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 557
« Reply #13 on: March 24, 2008, 12:58:19 PM »
Quote from: ajrb69 on March 24, 2008, 05:03:41 AM
Thanks, but that still does not clue me to why Comodo fails the integrity tests.

If COMODO thinks outpost is installed then you will fail the integrity test.  Regardless if it really is installed.
Logged
*Vista *CFP V3 *Avira * Avast *Spyware Doctor
*XP *Zone Alarm PRO *NOD32 V2.7 *Spysweeper
Tags:
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Firewall
Page created in 0.145 seconds with 19 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks 		Design by 7dana.com