Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 18, 2010, 12:41:36 PM

Login with username, password and session length

372465 Posts
41293 Topics
93950 Members

Latest Member: Partyboy

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  General Category
| |-+  General Discussion (off topic) Anything and everything...
| | |-+  Review???
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Review???  (Read 913 times)
Stealth
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« on: January 09, 2007, 12:21:20 AM »

I was just about to install Comodo.....However, after reading this review, I'm not so sure anymore. Perhaps one of the Mods could comment about these "security holes". Also, what about Comodo's resource ussage....seems a bit high considering for a firewall that  doesn't block ads or spyware.

http://www.matousec.com/projects/windows-personal-firewall-analysis/Comodo-Personal-Firewall-2.3.6.81/

Thanks,

Stealth
Logged
marc57
Guest
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2007, 12:49:36 AM »

"The development of this firewall probably missed independent betatesting of its security features because the number and the nature of bugs we have found in it is alarming. This is why we can not recommend Comodo Personal Firewall as a personal firewall solution to anyone who require the real protection against today's malware"



This doesn't sound good.
Logged
Little Mac
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6258



« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2007, 12:20:50 PM »

There's been a LOT of discussion about this in the Leaktesting and Feedback sections.  Part of all this comes from the way Matousec does their tests.  In order for any firewall to pass all of their criteria (you should note that none have; they do not recommend any of the firewalls they tested), it must be more than a firewall.  It must monitor processes, and a whole score of other things that truly fall outside the range of a firewall; it must be a full HIPS, and really, be flawless.

Obviously, no one hits the mark.

The thing to key in on, is that as hard as they slam CPF, they still say that is "better than others."  It may be not much better, but it is better.  Thus, in the world of Matousec, CPF may suck scummy pondwater through a bent straw, but that is apparently (in their opinion) better than the others. 

You should read their conclusions on Zone Alarm Pro, or Kerio, or any of them...

Marc, their comment about the "real protection against today's malware" is apparently referencing protection outside what a firewall would normally give (ie, a HIPS).  This is since, per their tests, CPF is far and above any other firewall in regards to leaktests.  And THAT is exactly what a software firewall is supposed to do - keep things in that are not supposed to get out.

LM
Logged

You read my sig block.  That's enough personal interaction for one day. Kewl
Júštiñ™
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2868



« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2007, 03:34:59 PM »

Hello,

No matter what flaws they may have found, all programs have flaw, in the end Comodo got the highest test score Wink
Logged

When the power of love, overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.

~Jimi Hendrix
Tags:
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Certificate Free Virus Removal Firewall
Page created in 0.176 seconds with 18 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com