Remove-malware

[Guest]

[panic]

ehm guys, while it's fun talking about ppl behind their back, it's just not right.....fun nevertheless, but not right....i guess....maybe....just a thought 

how about, instead of bashing other forum/ppl, you guys start a topic praising someone 
you can start with praising me,satisfy my ego,that should be fun....for me

 

+1

Pick the fights that are worth winning. This ain't.

[Monkey_Boy=)]

Fair enough.. Some stuff is a bit "personal" and should not be discussed at least not without the person in question.. But I don't regret making the thread.. I think the thread highlights something very important and I hope Matt listen and care some about the comodo community as well since I know many who kinda agree: A mod is using his powers to "steer" the discussion how HE wants.. I know for a fact that Iam not alone with this thought since there is an other member there who I know somewhat well with similar "experiences", I don't think their Mods are too happy about how the moderation is happening either since an other moderator encouraged me to contact Matt (its like Ganda is telling me to contact Melih about Panic messing with my posts), and by looking at some posts here it seems like there are some in this forum with similar experiences as well..

I think its an issue when a forum is becoming to heavily moderated, I hope he loses his control over the comodo part of the forum at least, Since when talking his hate "issue" he is no longer respecting the forums rules (at least he wasn't according to the rules I read and not according to an other MOD).. Ofc he should still be able to say his stuff.. But the guy was removing my stuff EVEN when the stuff I posted was following every rule with the attitude "I can remove whatever I want" (yes he said that..).. I don't think he is that suited to be moderating.. He is not respecting the forum he is at with an attitude like that..

I know Matt is a reasonable human, and I hope there will be no more censorship and that us from comodo can have our say as well in "subjects" about CIS/comodo just like the KIS, Norton and OA "fanboys" are welcome to say their stuff without having their posts removed even when they are not against the rules..

But Iam probably hoping for to much.. The "Internet security" discussions forums are becoming the most miserable communities around.. We have Wilders, where every product and employees from every company is welcome, except comodo with guys like Melih.. Wilders is also a place where they lock "most" comodo threads and tell us "stay on topic" while letting the same haters start offtopic discussions by posting over and over in every comodo thread to say "Melih fanboy toolbar softpedia..".. None cares whats "correct" and whats not, just the same sh*t repeated over and over, there is a saying "A Lie, Repeated Often Enough, Becomes Truth".. And its pretty much what is happening, the "toolbar" is not really a big thing, products has had it for years no big deal, uncheck it.. But when CIS has it, chaos breaks out! The other "legitimate concerns" are also just "junk" so melih got banned? So there was a disagreement between softpedia and comodo but that issue is now solved?.. Anyhow apart from wilders we have calendar of update where they claim ASKtoolbar and safe-surf is the same (misleading users ftw), where they also act like a "little brother" to wilders and post the same "toolbar fanboy melih softpedia" stuff over and over whatever you talk about the same stuff is being brought up at these sites "toolbar fanboy melih softpedia" and some other junk thats irrelevant to the new CIS version. And most likely if you argue against it, you will get a warning.

[Melih]

If I start a security forum focused on bashing Symantec and banned their CEO...who would you say was the sad one?

Of course this is an exaggeration to the Wilders/Melih thing, but then again, people at Wilders seem to dislike Comodo and its stuff.

Can anyone see the post i made that lead to my ban there?

Melih

[JamesFrance]

Can anyone see the post i made that lead to my ban there?

Melih

No, so presumably it was deleted?

I've had posts deleted there too.

Or maybe it never happened?

[Beanie]

May I then suggest that this thread be locked? With the permission of the original poster, obviously.

[JamesFrance]

Now why would you suggest that, just when it is getting interesting?

The best thing about this forum is the freedom of speech, unlike others I could mention.

[gleach]

Im with james, if it cant be discussed here then where? its been read 450 times in 2 days, ppl are interested.

[panic]

Now why would you suggest that, just when it is getting interesting?

The best thing about this forum is the freedom of speech, unlike others I could mention.

Topic locked. It's not really freedom of speech if the individual in question can't respond here, is it?

Edit:
I've been PM'd several times by several members to unlock this topic. Given the individual in question cannot respond to any criticisms posted here, it's unfair to allow others to express their opinions of the individual in question.

Sorry, but no. IMHO it should remain locked. If you can convince other mods that reopening this topic serves a benefit to the members (other than providing a soapbox), while remaining open and equitable to all persons mentioned within the topic, then it can be unlocked. Until then, sorry, but no.

[Tags:]