Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 19, 2010, 07:00:20 AM

Login with username, password and session length

372767 Posts
41340 Topics
93993 Members

Latest Member: dear

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  General Category
| |-+  General Discussion (off topic) Anything and everything...
| | |-+  Comodo Update sends more info upstream than downstream
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Comodo Update sends more info upstream than downstream  (Read 5101 times)
Goeroeboeroe
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 80


WWW
« Reply #15 on: January 28, 2007, 07:41:14 PM »

It's alright with me if people are trying to find a catch in important security apps like a firewall. But I think you should at least have some proof that something is wrong before starting to shout.
In this case it looks to me like what I (and many others) did in my childhood: ringing a bell, running away and hiding, and looking what happened. Big fun of course when somebody got really angry. But I stopped doing this when I was about 12 years old.

In newsgroups it's getting less, luckily. Now it's more somebody doesn't like the interface and things like that, but less about ads and spyware. And interfaces etc. are merely a matter of taste.
But I still don't understand why it's almost alone about Comodo when it comes to spyware etc.
McAfee is a commercial firm too. They own SiteAdvisor, so they can collect EVERY site you ever visit. Don't know if they keep that information, but they can, if they want. And they never say they're in it for the money, which they certainly are. So if you are afraid about spying...
Comodo is very open about also using CPF as a way to get their brand known and make money that way. Since Comodo is so open about that, I don't think there's anything wrong with that. (Well, hmm, in my paradise there's no money, but I'm probably the last dinosaur on this earth dreaming of such a world  Smiley)
So I still don't understand why it's almost always Comodo that gets attacked.

Peter
« Last Edit: January 28, 2007, 07:43:02 PM by Goeroeboeroe » Logged
kcrannie
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 61



« Reply #16 on: January 28, 2007, 08:28:03 PM »

Yes i do understand indeed Kevin Smiley

However, I want our forums to be an open and frank discussion area. David2007 has obviously made a big judgemental error. I am sure he is big of a man to come and accept this. Simply removing his post, even though would be the easiest solution, is not the way I operate. I am more than happy to handle these issues in public and will continue to do so. Everyone must see how we handle every kind of situation so that we gain their trust.

cheers

Melih

ps: now I know how you look Smiler

I don't see your picture in the "Meet the Administrators and Moderators" thread.  Fair is fair. Smiley

That said, I'm most pleased with the performance CPF is providing me with the highest level of protection over an always-on connection, and will continue to remain true to Comodo unless reason is given for me to otherwise question Comodo's purpose and viability. 
« Last Edit: January 28, 2007, 08:33:01 PM by kcrannie » Logged

"Oh, to be alive in such an age when miracles are everywhere and every inch of common air throbs a tremendous prophecy of greater marvels yet to be."
 - Walt Whitman
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8651



WWW
« Reply #17 on: January 28, 2007, 11:09:40 PM »


So I still don't understand why it's almost always Comodo that gets attacked.

Peter


Because no one is doing what Comodo is doing! We are different and what we are doing is effecting other competitors.

Melih
Logged

Tags:
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Certificate Free Virus Removal Firewall
Page created in -0 seconds with 16 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com