Why is hopsurf selected by default?

[Guest]

[DragonMaster Jay]

Actually, the Trojan Dropper seems to send fake alerts through BHOs and Toolbars, therefore setting off defense software. Do a HijackThis scan, and you will see some of those results.

[Quill]

You people really do not see a problem with any of this?
their own software hits on their own cash-cow bed-fellow,and the detection is removed?

A interesting point. However, if I install the Ask Toolbar into IE and it's not detected by Malwarebytes, or Prevx, or A-squared or MSE, or for that matter AntiVir, then of course Kaspersky missed it too, there aren't very many conclusions one may draw.

I guess all the others just missed it and CIS picked it up...

[Endymion]

EVEN IF there seems to not be a threat, there is proof that Ask Toolbar is malware.

Jay are you done leveraging on FP to put forward malware claims?

http://www.helpmyos.com/learn-security-f40/what-is-bad-about-ask-toolbar-t776.htm << Check this out axl.

Even if your first post is now deleted it has been quoted twice.

Even if that misinformed topic you linked a while ago has been suddenly removed it is still cached by google.

Your approach has not changed and you're continuing to evade questions.

I see you meant to advocate fear and doubt using your viewpoint about limewire as an example.

I would expect something real to possibly warrant such far fetched viewpoints against ASK search services.

I would like to know under what criteria the Ask Toolbar was declared Malware and what specifically was found to be malicious.

Jay, you say the service behind the Ask Toolbar is malicious. What does it do that is so bad, and, if so, what is your evidence for that?

I'll ask you again. What was you affiliation with the forum whose misinformed topic you linked a while ago?

And I'll invite everybody to take your approach in account along with the fact you are evading questions without even providing any relevant information to possibly warrant the claims you willingly introduced in this topic.

[DragonMaster Jay]

Endymion, you remind me of Data on CoU forum. Leave me alone. I can see that you are trying to pull information. I am rather tired of it. The gambits need to stop here. I am not required to explain myself.

(the topic was moved to a locked forum for malware analysts to look at)

Who are you to question a malware researcher, anyway?

[Quill]

[at]DMJay

No ones attacking you here, all anyone wants is something substantive.

I've read your posts over at CoU and I know you've been somewhat abused by those that believe they know better, believe me they don't.

The main question is simply this. You claim, that the service behind the Ask Toolbar is malicious. This may or may not be true. What we'd like to see is some evidence, as to why you believe this to be so.

I believe it's fair to say, that installing the Ask Toolbar, of and by itself, does not contain a threat, at least no more than can be expected from installing a similar toolbar from google or Microsoft.

Please try not to misinterpret posts here, it's in some ways understandable that people are a little defensive in light of the current onslaught by the clique from the Circle of Untruth.

[DragonMaster Jay]

Posting the screenshot and providing the Fiddler file earlier was my evidence. I was saying to check out the channels found in the fiddler file.

Ask Toolbar reports back to its server way more often than it should, indicating it is spying on the user and using ad-tracking abilities.

[kail]

My take..

Jay as a Malware Researcher you should already know that evidence & documentation is everything. Objectivity can help as well. Without it, you leave yourself exposed to the above. In addition, you should actively encourage what Endymion has done. It tests the results of your teams research to ensure there are no errors or omissions. This is vital process that companies pay good money for. Seriously. Also, these are public forums, if you want a more limited initial viewing, then you should consider initially publishing the results in a less public place. I do not believe it wise or beneficial to ask members to leave you alone in the way you have done after making your results public.

One more, very important thing, if you cannot demonstrate how this is related to HopSurf's installation specifically then it is, by definition, polluting this topic. You should have started a new topic.

[Endymion]

Endymion, you remind me of Data on CoU forum. Leave me alone. I can see that you are trying to pull information. I am rather tired of it. The gambits need to stop here. I am not required to explain myself.
Who are you to question a malware researcher, anyway?

Jay, there is no title to spread misinformation.

If you are willing to claim you are a real "malware researcher" state for what company you work.

[Quill]

[at]DMJay

Have you done comparative Fiddler tests against other search toolbars. I have, and there really is little to choose between them.

I also have to ask, by what criteria do you judge 'spying on the user'? Does google spy on us? do Microsoft via bing?

Lets put it in to perspective:

Install a search toolbar of choice

Every toolbar has, by definition, an engine that powers the toolbar.

Every search you enter therefore, is subject to capture, use, and subsequent analysis by the engine provider, unless said engine provider categorically denies otherwise (then you may believe what you wish)

This is the world we live in, unless you take measures to counter these abuses you will be a statistic in as many databases as the websites you have visited.

I have to also reiterate Kail's point. This thread is about HopSerf. No one denies the engine behind this is Ask/IAC, it's in the EULA. Unless you have a specific argument or pertinent information regarding this, a separate discussion thread would be better.   




 

[Tags:]