Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 26, 2009, 02:49:12 AM

Login with username, password and session length

345220 Posts
38116 Topics
86559 Members

Latest Member: lakisha23

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Desktop Security Products
| |-+  Comodo Internet Security - CIS
| | |-+  Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News - CIS
| | | |-+  Rating on matousec.com [Merged]
« previous next »
Poll
Question: should comodo have 100% results in these tests
Yes - 24 (50%)
No - 18 (37.5%)
Not sure - 6 (12.5%)
Total Voters: 47

Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Rating on matousec.com [Merged]  (Read 8882 times)
loveboy_lion
Comodo Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 38



« on: December 22, 2008, 01:37:50 AM »

Comodo should score 100% in overall tests

http://www.matousec.com/projects/firewall-challenge/results.php#detailed-results

this is my wish list
Logged


loveboy_lion
Comodo Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 38



« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2008, 01:42:52 AM »

comodo scored overall 90% in the test conducted and the results are below it stood second and i want it to be the first so people check the link below and vote your opinions
http://www.matousec.com/projects/firewall-challenge/results.php#detailed-results
« Last Edit: December 22, 2008, 01:44:55 AM by loveboy_lion » Logged


Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8368



WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2008, 01:46:32 AM »

it is the first!

they just haven't retested it Smiley

Melih
Logged

loveboy_lion
Comodo Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 38



« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2008, 01:52:10 AM »

I too personally belive and have full faith in comodo its only that i wont it to be more strong in detection and protection thats it everything else can wait
Logged


Kyle
Computer Security Testing Group
Comodo's Hero
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3274



WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2008, 02:06:02 AM »

Defense+ is protection, It's bullet proof Wink  (No known ways to bypass it) Detection and cure is being worked on.
Logged

E5200 2.5ghz [at] 3.33ghz, POV 9800gt 512mb, 2gb DDR2 RAM.  500gb. HDD


~~~
Trying to see if I can completely switch to linux Cheesy
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8368



WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2008, 04:31:58 AM »

our latest version is no 1 already and the ones we don't pass, there is no point in passing cos they don't represent real threat to our users.

We will always make sure you are protected well, but we won't go add unneccessary code just to pass some tests Smiley

thanks
Melih
Logged

SecurityManiac
Malware Research Group
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 358


Live today Life might end tomorrow


« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2008, 05:04:22 AM »

Sounds reasonable. My idea as well
Logged
Android2007
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 55


« Reply #7 on: January 07, 2009, 01:08:23 PM »

Here are results Wink
http://www.matousec.com/projects/firewall-challenge/results.php
« Last Edit: January 07, 2009, 01:12:57 PM by Android2007 » Logged
JamesFrance
Comodo's Hero
*****
Online Online

Posts: 681



« Reply #8 on: January 07, 2009, 02:29:55 PM »

Yes but that is not the latest version of CIS.
Logged

James
Star Shadow
Computer Security Testing Group
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 286


« Reply #9 on: January 07, 2009, 02:54:32 PM »

They separated the tables! That was the suggestion I sent them. They thought it was a good idea to make things easier to understand by users and to separate the tests because it's not fair to compare products when they were tested with different tests. I am happy they used my suggestion. Tongue
Logged

I'm getting Married!!!
commanding the celsius
Product Translator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1281


^^^^


« Reply #10 on: January 07, 2009, 03:21:34 PM »

They separated the tables! That was the suggestion I sent them. They thought it was a good idea to make things easier to understand by users and to separate the tests because it's not fair to compare products when they were tested with different tests. I am happy they used my suggestion. Tongue

haha nice there.


And its good that Comodo don't a turtle, a turtle sitting on a rock around and add unnecessary futures just to pass a test. (like the Outpost folks does) But all things that pose a threat should (and has) always be fixed! (as far as I know..)
Logged
DaRtH VaDeR.
Usability Study Member
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1768


Everything in life comes to an end, exept life


« Reply #11 on: January 07, 2009, 04:02:31 PM »

Comodo should be first there...... They teached the free version of online armor a lesson, now they must teach the PAID version of online armor a lesson.... the difference is 3%, that is in this field a big chunk....

I hope in the next round, CIS will celebrating its first place in hsitory since those test began!
Logged

DaRtH VaDeR says: "The path of success and progress is not to be reached by the things you have done, but by the things you will do, so think before you act,the voice of your history will confirm this fact.."

DaRtH VaDeR says: "Your system is as secure as the weakest link in your entire security"
commanding the celsius
Product Translator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1281


^^^^


« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2009, 04:20:08 PM »

Comodo should be first there...... They teached the free version of online armor a lesson, now they must teach the PAID version of online armor a lesson.... the difference is 3%, that is in this field a big chunk....

I hope in the next round, CIS will celebrating its first place in hsitory since those test began!

CIS is not aiming to spot the top in these tests. (of course darth vader know this)
But maby comodo should, as its a big PR thing, even if its not the real deal.

Like Egemen said about the System shutdown thing included in the Matousec challange:

"System shutdown poses no real threat. The malware waits for system shutdown to perform its harmful actions. So whether you intercept or not, it can attack the user when the user manually logs out. Original System Shutdown Simulation tests do care about this fact.
So we do not plan to add this redundant protection to pass any tests."

+ Comodo don't pay to be retested like many of the others does to get a higher rating. Even thou I feel that the Matousec guy(s) probably deserves some payment for his great job in putting a new firewall standard.
Has he considered google ads?
haha  Cheesy
« Last Edit: January 07, 2009, 04:22:14 PM by Monkey_Boy=) » Logged
LeoniAquila
Still non-retired moderator but on vacation for a while
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6632



« Reply #13 on: January 07, 2009, 04:52:10 PM »

I voted "not sure".

our latest version is no 1 already and the ones we don't pass, there is no point in passing cos they don't represent real threat to our users.

We will always make sure you are protected well, but we won't go add unneccessary code just to pass some tests Smiley

I trust this as I trust Comodo/CIS. I'm just afraid that people rely 100% on a 95% (or whatever percentage) test result. People don't know about Comodo's view on real threats vs. tests (unless they read your posts Melih), they just see the test. Undecided
Logged

Moderator LeoniAquila:
Aims to keep the forum a friendly place. Any concerns? Please send me a PM and/or review the Forum Policy.
AeoniAn
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 243


Protected & Armoured. COMODO is here!


« Reply #14 on: January 07, 2009, 10:02:43 PM »

100%  Huh??

    no...


  (B)
Logged

CIS v574 full: Proactive, FW Custom, D+ Paranoid, IE normal, AV statf, heur med.
Sempron 3000+, MB MSI-7145, 1GB RAM
XP-SP3-Pro-BR x32 + W7-64 + Ubuntu LTS x64
ADM rights, Cable-PPPoA
PeerBlock v1.0+r
A-SquaredAM + MBAM + SAS (w/o any real-time)
Zero, Nada, No-one single infecction >49 months
Tags:
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Certificate Free Virus Removal Firewall
Page created in -0 seconds with 19 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com