Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 29, 2009, 11:18:27 PM

Login with username, password and session length

346125 Posts
38241 Topics
86848 Members

Latest Member: bdag

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Desktop Security Products
| |-+  Comodo Internet Security - CIS
| | |-+  Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News - CIS
| | | |-+  OpenDNS vs Comodo Secure DNS
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: OpenDNS vs Comodo Secure DNS  (Read 4116 times)
kunri
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


« on: July 05, 2009, 04:30:14 AM »

Technically does CS DNS provide same features as OpenDNS i.e. blocking malicious sites etc?
Logged
Quill
Volunteer
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2731


Follow the White Rabbit...


« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2009, 04:36:46 AM »

It does. Read more here:

http://www.comodo.com/secure-dns/
Logged

"Well, I've wrestled with reality for 35 years, Doctor, and I'm happy to state I finally won out over it."

Forum Policy
HeffeD
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1528


« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2009, 01:04:39 PM »

It does not however, (at least as far as I can tell) allow the user any control over which sites to block.

OpenDNS will allow the user to blacklist or whitelist particular sites. Yes I know you can blacklist with the firewall in CIS, (no whitelisting though) but OpenDNS makes it really easy to apply the same filters to multiple machines.
Logged

kunri
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2009, 02:56:09 AM »

Well. Developers of an excellent product like CIS might add this feature one day.  We can wait patiently.
Logged
imanewuser
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2009, 10:18:20 AM »

At least where I live (south central Montgomery County, MD), using Verizon DSL's lowest choice of service (bandwidth 1184Kbps/488Kbps), and testing my throughput using both of the following websites via Firefox 3.5 to test my speed:
http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/  and 
http://www.wurd.com/thoughput/thruput.htm
I achieved consistently slightly faster results with OpenDNS than I did with Comodo Secure DNS.  Individual results may vary with the relative proximity of the Comodo and OpenDNS DNS servers to the servers your ISP uses to provide you with your internet access.
Logged
HeffeD
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1528


« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2009, 04:05:17 PM »

At least where I live (south central Montgomery County, MD), using Verizon DSL's lowest choice of service (bandwidth 1184Kbps/488Kbps), and testing my throughput using both of the following websites via Firefox 3.5 to test my speed:
http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/  and 
http://www.wurd.com/thoughput/thruput.htm
I achieved consistently slightly faster results with OpenDNS than I did with Comodo Secure DNS.  Individual results may vary with the relative proximity of the Comodo and OpenDNS DNS servers to the servers your ISP uses to provide you with your internet access.

DNS is merely a database to resolve host names to IP addresses... A quicker DNS service can speed up your browsing experience because the less time it takes to connect you to the destination server the faster you can flip from page to page. However, it will not improve your throughput!

Any difference you see in upload/download speeds are due to factors other than DNS.
Logged

Beanie
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 545


I am a saxophonist.


« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2009, 03:29:21 PM »

Hey everyone, just as a side note, the free version of OpenDNS doesn't actually block malware sites, only phishing sites and botnets.

http://www.opendns.com/start/
Logged
bluesjunior
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 360


« Reply #7 on: November 03, 2009, 05:41:53 AM »

Prior to using Comodo DNS I used the free version of Open DNS, can honestly say I have never ever noticed any difference at all.
Logged
PSchuetz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 19

I'm interested in iNet, Security and Betatests


« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2009, 05:02:07 PM »

Hi there,

another alternative is e.g. the Internet Guide from dyndns www.dyndns.com
It offers the same if not more protection, based on barracuda www.barracudanetworks.com

But I don't know, whether I should use any of these, because neither is faster or better for me..!

I'm using the second DNS IP from my local ISP provider and it's very fast, response time here in Germany is about 10 ms.

If I ping the others including Comodo Secure DNS I get 12-30 ms respsone time.

8-12 ms for my local isp unitymedia (cable-modem).
14-19 ms for Internet Guide from dyndns.
12-18 ms to opendsn.

And 20-30 ms for Comodo Secure-DNS.
I.e. too slow for comdo!

regards,

PSchuetz
Logged

Security counts, Security first.
Jim__
Comodo Loves me
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 104


« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2009, 05:12:28 PM »

You might want to try DNSTESTER to compare the response to DNS requests.
Logged
PSchuetz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 19

I'm interested in iNet, Security and Betatests


« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2009, 10:24:50 PM »

Hi there,

I wonder if Comodo can compete with Google DNS... Smiley Wink :p

http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/intro.html

regards,

PSchuetz Roll Eyes
Logged

Security counts, Security first.
Toxteth O'Grady
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 538


« Reply #11 on: December 12, 2009, 08:19:13 AM »

Why not use two DNS servers and a user definable cache at the same time?    Cool

http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/Network/fc/Freeware.htm
Logged
Beanie
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 545


I am a saxophonist.


« Reply #12 on: December 12, 2009, 09:16:53 AM »

Why not use two DNS servers and a user definable cache at the same time?    Cool

http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/Network/fc/Freeware.htm

That looks AWESOME! But I'm on a mac... Cool
Logged
jay2007tech
Malware Research Group
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 420


« Reply #13 on: December 12, 2009, 11:59:13 AM »

I put it on both of my parents and relatives computer. IMO Smiley   Comodo Secure DNS seems to be slightly faster then opendns, and I'm going to guess that it's a little more secure because of the fact it's comodo.  I haven't put comodo dns to the test, but I'm going to assume it secure enough.  You can go wrong with fast, secure and free
Logged

It's hard being a crooked Admin when the files won't pass an md5checksum test.  But like any other good crooked Admin it can be done, it just takes time(and lots of it) and a few aspirins
giraffe
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 569



« Reply #14 on: December 12, 2009, 12:12:11 PM »

Why not use two DNS servers and a user definable cache at the same time?    Cool

http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/Network/fc/Freeware.htm

Thanks for the link.
Downloaded, installed, started it and got just a blank square in the tray (not even an icon) that gave the correct tooltip but no reaction to either mouse button.
Removed, d/l again and the file was the same size, tried installing and got the same result, so I'll stick with TreeWalk.
Logged

XP Pro SP3
CIS
Avast!
Opera
SAS
Tags:
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Certificate Free Virus Removal Firewall
Page created in 0.053 seconds with 17 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com