Comodo detected the malware which is missed by kaspersky, avast etc.

[Guest]

[OmeletGuy]

virSCAN.ORG is using 3.10 already!  

[devenroy]

CIS is keeping up fine with its 5-6 days old database running at VT.. 

Hi, Monkey_Boy
Yes, it was updating properly (like up-to-date) before isnt it? now it seems stuck maybe as CIS will not support 3.9 virus signature update to 1538 as per notice in latest 3.10.xxxx.531 version release, which is as follows:-
Note: AV updates for CIS 3.9 users have been frozen at V1538. In order to avail further updates, users must switch to CIS 3.10.

virSCAN.ORG is using 3.10 already! 

Hi OmeletGuy,
Happy to see atleast virscan is at 3.10 

[devenroy]

Probable malware sent to virscan.org (22/38 antivirus detected it)
Comodo DETECTED it, but it was NOT DETECTED by,
MCAFEE, TRENDMICRO, CA(VET), FORTINET, NORMAN, QUICKHEAL, RISING, SUNBELT, ETC.
HAVE A LOOK,
http://www.virscan.org/report/e72428532a202c6766f64078c9ea4a25.html

Probable malware sent to virscan.org (35/38 detected it)
Comodo DETECTED it, but it was NOT DETECTED by,
MCAFEE, MKS_VIR, VIROBOT, HAVE A LOOK
http://www.virscan.org/report/411cbe6e5e79d6376c4961270d6017f8.html

Probable malware sent to virustotal.com (8/41 detected it)
Comodo MISSED it, but it was detected by few other antivirus. have a look,
http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/20c60bcf0f35d9b43ebbde42c776dc56389e1c17e461566be358de45fad2ed05-1247046417

File is being submitted to comodo through CIS>Miscelleneous> Submit suspicious files>
IF malware found in it, detection will be added.

All these results show us that no doubt comodo antivirus is improving in detection & can catch malwares which are missed by reputed antivirus such as kaspersky, antivir, avast, etc.
Still comodo antivirus can not detect 100% malwares (as no other antivirus company can although some of them can claim they can give you 100% protection 

Still CIS has Defense + which is next generation protection, Default Deny in defense+ is the way forward, So its like prevention (defense+) is better than cure (antivirus).

It also HIGHLIGHTS the fact that, Antivirus should not be the first line of defense, Defense + is (and default deny protection is the golden key) 

[bequick]

http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/f8807bf5276a0711b48a96443ea8766790294272b797a22a8e7b0ae71d2fe1dc-1247056818
and
http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/b663d06f9785433548aa8f823d75b2e121695eb5eedb1a94b4ef3a4849d31915-1247056881
and
http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/b663d06f9785433548aa8f823d75b2e121695eb5eedb1a94b4ef3a4849d31915-1247056881
I don't know what VT are doing, but i think they are scanning with comodo's heuritics disabled.

[devenroy]

hi bequick, thanks for posting
The malwares results you shown is it for the samples which is submitted by you? if yes then did comodo antivirus detect them with heruistic set at low?

[bequick]

http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/dc54fedd3b802d6e8c0b491db39991cf1c660eff53989a35860cfd1d7e481cfc-1246790245

http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/11eab8136f60974d8b78f5ce661bebdbbb6960546c4822a31dd018a2bd3a7562-1247014830 (it's crack-patch for winrar) I've tested it with sunbelt(av+antispy),Ikarus virus utilities and Kaspersky,but nothing really happened.

[devenroy]

Thanks bequick, nice to see you keeping this thread alive.

[Petit]

Personality I like Virscan more than Virustotal.
But virscan often high service load.

[devenroy]

Personality I like Virscan more than Virustotal.
But virscan often high service load.

Petit i also like virscan.org more than virustotal but it has high service load so i prefer virustotal too.
we are twins (who see the same) lol

[Petit]

Petit i also like virscan.org more than virustotal but it has high service load so i prefer virustotal too.
we are twins (who see the same) lol

But Virscan have a fewer antivirus engine. (No Pctools to Virscan.)
And different version to.

Note : GData on Virscan used Kaspersky and Avast engine but Gdata on Virustotal used Bitdefender and Avast engine 

[Tags:]