Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 08, 2009, 06:57:31 PM

Login with username, password and session length

333432 Posts
36827 Topics
83524 Members

Latest Member: MariaTCTfounds

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Desktop Security Products
| |-+  Comodo Internet Security - CIS
| | |-+  Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News - CIS
| | | |-+  322 outbound connections, is this normal ??
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: 322 outbound connections, is this normal ??  (Read 1055 times)
viper
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 69


« on: July 03, 2009, 02:33:24 PM »

with previous version of comodo outbound connections  would never go higher than 60 or 70.  Since 3.10 outbound connections go as high as 322. 
Logged
OmeletGuy
Good gamer, Omelet Chef, Rogue AV hater!
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Online Online

Posts: 1330


The only thing i ask for are eggs.


WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2009, 03:16:13 PM »

Whats the program thats outbound?

Let me guess, svhost?
Logged

What you see isn’t what you always get!
L.A.R. Grizzly
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 411


Akron, Ohio, USA


WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2009, 06:39:44 PM »

with previous version of comodo outbound connections  would never go higher than 60 or 70.  Since 3.10 outbound connections go as high as 322. 

I'm showing 120 right now. Mostly from my bittorrent client (Vuze).
Logged

WinXP Pro SP3
CIS 3.12.111745.560 and CSC 2.1.114194.1
Firefox and Thunderbird
OmeletGuy
Good gamer, Omelet Chef, Rogue AV hater!
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Online Online

Posts: 1330


The only thing i ask for are eggs.


WWW
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2009, 06:52:41 PM »

I'm showing 120 right now. Mostly from my bittorrent client (Vuze).

Vuze is now in the My Trusted Venders so the firewall is mostlikely making rules for it!
Logged

What you see isn’t what you always get!
EricJH
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4139



« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2009, 06:55:46 PM »

Somebody suggested that the time windows of active connections may be bigger with 3.10 when compared to 3.9. That would explain it.
Logged

Triple boot: XP SP3, Vista Ultimate 32 SP2 and Win7 RTM (default) , Always the latest CIS or CIS Beta (too lazy to update my sig) Athlon XP 2600 1 GB RAM. Opera Browser always using the latest snapshots; Opera 10.10 as of now
viper
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 69


« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2009, 10:32:50 PM »

Somebody suggested that the time windows of active connections may be bigger with 3.10 when compared to 3.9. That would explain it.

Yes it is a 3.10 issue.  I have listed it in the bugs report thread.  I saw a few others mention the same issue.  So it is for sure  3.10 issue.  I went back to 3.9 and outbound connections is back to normal (about 30-50).  I expect a patch will be coming for 3.10 with bug fixes.  The comodo devs are good so i have faith in them.   Thumb Up

Logged
EricJH
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4139



« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2009, 08:32:00 AM »

Please do notice that going back to 3.9 you won't get any updates for the AV when using it.
Logged

Triple boot: XP SP3, Vista Ultimate 32 SP2 and Win7 RTM (default) , Always the latest CIS or CIS Beta (too lazy to update my sig) Athlon XP 2600 1 GB RAM. Opera Browser always using the latest snapshots; Opera 10.10 as of now
Budda
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 69


« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2009, 12:01:16 PM »

I get about the same issue here.  When using Google Chrome V 2.X I get around 120-200 outbound connections. 
Logged
viper
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 69


« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2009, 08:25:17 PM »

Somebody suggested that the time windows of active connections may be bigger with 3.10 when compared to 3.9. That would explain it.

What does that mean?  Is that good or bad?
Logged
HeffeD
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1333


« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2009, 08:53:30 PM »

What does that mean?  Is that good or bad?

Neither. Just a different way of displaying them. They tend to stack up because they aren't released as quickly in CIS. It's strictly a display issue.

In other words, the old method might have displayed the outgoing connections for ten seconds, and now it displays them for thirty seconds. (I don't know the actual timeout, this is just for example purposes) This means you'll have more connections sitting in the list at any given time.

So it's good if you want to take the time to inspect the connections because they hang around longer, but bad if you get concerned at seeing hundreds of outgoing connections listed by CIS.  Wink
Logged

viper
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 69


« Reply #10 on: July 07, 2009, 01:58:20 AM »

thanks for the explanation.   I would have to say that its better they way they did it in 3.10.   I went back to 3.10

Logged
Tags:
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Certificate Free Virus Removal Firewall
Page created in 0.049 seconds with 19 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com