Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 11, 2008, 08:28:31 PM

Login with username, password and session length

199464 Posts
22903 Topics
54972 Members

Latest Member: rexSmall

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Desktop Security Products
| |-+  Comodo Firewall
| | |-+  Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News
| | | |-+  Which PlugIns would you like?
« previous next »
Poll
Question: Vote for the Plugins you want in CFP (you cannot see the results unless you vote)
Cookies,Referrers,Ads Blocker
IP Blocker
Skin (Implemented in version 3)
HTTP Logs
DNS Resolution
Parental Control
Whois
AntiDialer
PopUp Blocker (Implemented in version 3.0.23.364+)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Which PlugIns would you like?  (Read 30842 times)
Chaos18
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 96


« Reply #15 on: February 10, 2007, 09:22:07 AM »

When will Comodo make it decision to develop plugins or not?
Logged
-NiCeGuY-
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4


« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2007, 07:31:23 AM »

i will choose 1 ,2 , 4 , 5 ,7   Bounce , block ads plugin like outpost , i think this function is good  Clapping
Logged
Flashstar
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2007, 01:14:31 AM »

Certainly any plugins would be great, but I find the ip blocking and ad blocking to be the most useful especially if it can be done without slowing down the internet connection. I like Peerguardian, but work hasn't been done on it for a year and a half. Also, a proxy virus scanner would be simply awesome for those of us who have servers.
Logged
KPK4444
Comodo Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 42


« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2007, 10:51:53 AM »

Id like a plug-in that gets rid of your tracks. A tracks cleaner, like the one Zonealarm has.
Logged

Chaos18
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 96


« Reply #19 on: February 18, 2007, 02:01:31 PM »

So when will Comodo give the green light to develop plugins? or the red light not to? Tongue
Logged
Bluesman
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 551


Only Amiga Makes It Possible


« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2007, 05:53:49 AM »

So when will Comodo give the green light to develop plugins? or the red light not to? Tongue
Stay alive and you will notice it Wink

I will spend my money at my bookmaker, that they tell us in may Wink *just guessing...but I hope I win*  Grin

I think they now work hard on the 3.0 version, but plugins would really be nice to see in the firewall in the future.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2007, 05:58:30 AM by Bluesman » Logged

"The blues are the roots, everything else is the fruits" -Willie Dixon
Arioch
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« Reply #21 on: February 19, 2007, 08:17:10 AM »

Hi guys,
First: As I stated above those plugins will be addons for CFP. If you do not install it it will not slow down your pcs. Wink
Second: I am not a big fun of the idea of blocking adds. But we should think about the members that connect with 56k and GPRS. When I used GPRS those adds made the navigation very difficult.

I started browsing with 19.2 Kbps modems :-)

ad-blocking is merely a function of firewall, same is about referer, etc.
It is easily done with browser.
It is especially so, since that filtering may corrupt web-site - and how will user know ?

So whether CPF would do it, i hope it will be low priority task, perhaps some elementary function for marketing hype and taking hour or two to implement.



What is DNS resolution ?


If make a swiss knife out of CPF, i'd prefer easy spam reporting, look at e-mail, track its path and forward with customised template to abuse [ at ] , postmaster [ at ]  etc contacts for servers, the spam message went through.


One more plugin - is NAT traversal.
There is two protocols, allowing outside port opening: UPnP and ZeroConf draft. Many modern routers, even when chained, can respect those commands.
There are also UDP-based TCP emulating networks like Hamachi and gg-game.com
Afair there was also an "Best practives" RFC recently published.

To modify settings for my VoIP or P2P or online game, slloeing them to automagically obtainsome virtual adapter with outside IP/port could be a unique feature in all the firewalls.


More: traffic counter and categorizer.
I'd like to be able to import rules from some online file (and let Firewall periodically re-check it) with some arbitrary format (external script ? regexps?) so that Firewall would show me totals of several traffic groups (for example one ISP i used had free, cheap and expensive internet zones).
It would be nice if menu over tray icon allowed me to not only block all traffic (see Panic button in wishlist) but also block any of those groups.
And let there be pop-ups, so i could make comodo alert me if, for example,
 1. "expensve" traffic run more than 1Mb/hour
 2. SMTP outgoing traffic runs more than 10Mb/5 minute - look like SPAM trojan inside.
 3. Let me see how many downstream traffic i wast when uploading large files, be it FTP or HTTP or some P2P
 4. Let me enter some URL and now how expensive it would be to me to conect to it. Which group certain server/service falls under. Somehow might be related to the next plugin idea.



Even more: smart traceroute.
I wish i could overlook which is the path to the site, used by Opera currently.
It is not what usual ICMP traceroute does, it is not relevant when traffice is differentiated by port, for example.
So, if posisble, it would be like to hijack any running apps to trace it's certain streams to certain services on certains servers.
If not - then just open list of current network data streams - and send treaceroute over certain local and remote ip/port's. http://pwhois.org/
« Last Edit: February 19, 2007, 10:44:46 AM by Arioch » Logged
Toggie
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1256


"Oh, let me have just a little bit of peril"


« Reply #22 on: February 25, 2007, 02:31:11 PM »

I consider these to be the most important of those listed:
 
IP Blocker    
HTTP Logs    
DNS Resolution    
Whois    

Ad and pop-up blocking are well catered for by numerous applications, although I can see why some may prefer an 'all in one solution'.

In addition to the Whois, a Trace Route function would be nice, as would a Netstat feature.    
Logged

One man alone can be pretty dumb sometimes, but for real bona fide stupidity, there ain't nothin' can beat teamwork.
Chaos18
Comodo Family Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 96


« Reply #23 on: February 25, 2007, 02:35:22 PM »

If Plugin will be a feature implemeted in 3.0 hopefully it is  Cheers

Are there any Comodo users here able to develop a plugin? and be very deticated to it? with constant updates etc Bounce
Logged
Bluesman
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 551


Only Amiga Makes It Possible


« Reply #24 on: February 27, 2007, 02:30:27 PM »


In addition to the Whois, a Trace Route function would be nice, as would a Netstat feature.    


Yes, that would be nice features.
Logged

"The blues are the roots, everything else is the fruits" -Willie Dixon
Pedro*
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 794


« Reply #25 on: March 01, 2007, 10:38:08 PM »

I'm sorry to disagree, but pluggins? Shocked

Quote
1. Plugin for Controlling the cookies, the referrer, and the advertisments on the pages
Opera Roll Eyes
Quote
2. Plugin for IP blocking. Something like the opensource peerguardian or a similar fast and lite ipblocker
Maybe, but as of now, no Grin
Quote
3. Plugin for changing the visual interface of CFP
For what? Huh
Quote
4. Plugin for http logging
I need help to understand what this is Embarrassed
Quote
5. Plugin for DNS resolution of the internet adresses.
I thought it was resolved Huh
Quote
6. Plugin for Parent controlling (for blocking sex sites, warez, etc.)
Interesting
Quote
7. Plugin for finding who is the attacker.
To do what? Undecided
Quote
8. Plugin for controlling the dialup number. An Antidialer feature
CPF HIPS Roll Eyes
Quote
9. Plugin for blocking popups
Opera Roll Eyes

Optional, ok, fine, each chooses what he wants. But make it a different download altogether, CPFa and CPFb. Leaving the FW open for pluggins makes me uneasy. Can you explain why this shouldn't be a concern?
Or in a separate program altogether. This is not what a FW should be doing IMO. Hey, it could even tweak Windows Tongue

Please consider these thoughts. I like the FW, HIPS and Sandbox i get, the latter i even want to use for sure, but all this!?

Don't take me wrong. This is my opinion, and i respect yours.

 Saved My Life so don't you kill it...
Logged
Bluesman
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 551


Only Amiga Makes It Possible


« Reply #26 on: March 02, 2007, 05:02:40 AM »

Opera

Not everybody use Opera

Plugin for changing the visual interface of CFP
For what?

Not everybody have the same taste. I am sure all WinAmp-users don't use the same skin. I like the GUI of the firewall, but I know people that don't like it.

Plugin for finding who is the attacker.
To do what?

It would be nice to do a quick look up about the attacker, so you don't need to use another program just to do a whois on the ip-address. Whois in the firewall would be a nice feature IMHO.
Logged

"The blues are the roots, everything else is the fruits" -Willie Dixon
pandlouk
I love Comodo
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2240


Panagiotis


« Reply #27 on: March 02, 2007, 05:10:56 AM »

Hi someone,

1&9. I know that Opera can resolve all this. In fact is my no1 browser. But others that use IE cannot control almost any of these.

2. This can be extremely handy.For the time being completely blocking an IP is quite difficult, since you have to create 2 new network rules.

3. Skins for CFP

4. It logs every http request that starts from your pc.

5. No, this will serve as a dns server for the places that you already have visited.

6. I agree. this one will help the parent controlling the navigation of their minor childs and protect them from bad surprises.

7. A whois feature. A lots of members have asked for this

8. I know, but this will control that the other users will not modify these settings. Wink

Because the plugins will be digitally certified by Comodo. If not CFP will not accept any of them.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2007, 05:12:48 AM by pandlouk » Logged
Pedro*
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 794


« Reply #28 on: March 02, 2007, 05:18:35 AM »

OK, i think i'm more comfortable, thanks for the clarifications. Smiley
Note that i won't be using none of this, and i still think it should be separate. Comodo will have complaints for resource usage i'm afraid. From the same people asking this.
 Cheers
Logged
pandlouk
I love Comodo
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2240


Panagiotis


« Reply #29 on: March 02, 2007, 05:22:52 AM »

OK, i think i'm more comfortable, thanks for the clarifications. Smiley
Note that i won't be using none of this, and i still think it should be separate. Comodo will have complaints for resource usage i'm afraid. From the same people asking this.
 Cheers

You are welcome. That is why they should be made only as add-ons. I'd hate to see CFP becoming a bloated application.
Logged
Tags:
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Firewall
Page created in -0 seconds with 22 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com