CFP v3 (un)usability opinion

[Guest]

[Melih]

Sure
...And according to "90/90" rule from Murphy's Laws the next 18 weeks (at least) shall b spent by a team of nine high-average devels onto hardening this product and protecting it from a misc tricks used by malware ("unhooking" for example)

Well, still watching and waiting for "Innovations end of next year"

Enjoy the view as you watch us!!!

Melih

[gibran]

There is an old topic about CFP GUI suggested improvements.

Regarding Config saved too lazzy and some changes losts on reboot. That one describe a CFP 3.0.25 bug. Network zones are not saved by clicking apply and the only workaround is to manually closing CFP from tray icon after editing Network zones.

I guess that Direct Disk access could be worth of a bugreport even though I guess it was something like a design decision.

I don't know where \Device\LanmanRedirector could be placed. Maybe Direct disk acces means direct device access.

[Yaraslau]

Hi! Just several words about usability. I have just installed new version of CFP ver. 3.0.25.378 and... Citation: The Defence+ is not functioning properly... Diagnostics? Nothing helped me. Learning mode? Is it a joke? Don't work! Guys, please, have a look at Agnitum OSS. PLEASE, have a look there. CFP on my computer looks like car from Formula-1 without driver. It's terrible and out of control!!! Sorry guys, but this product, to my mind, is absolutely weak. Delete CFP => install Agnitum OSS 2009. Suppose, COMODO team will rewrite this prog and it will work properly.

[Kyle]

Hi! Just several words about usability. I have just installed new version of CFP ver. 3.0.25.378 and... Citation: The Defence+ is not functioning properly... Diagnostics? Nothing helped me. Learning mode? Is it a joke? Don't work! Guys, please, have a look at Agnitum OSS. PLEASE, have a look there. CFP on my computer looks like car from Formula-1 without driver. It's terrible and out of control!!! Sorry guys, but this product, to my mind, is absolutely weak. Delete CFP => install Agnitum OSS 2009. Suppose, COMODO team will rewrite this prog and it will work properly.

What exactly is the problem? We can't help you If we don't know whats wrong!
Please start a new thread so we can help

[Tags:]