Welcome to the Comodo Forum
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
March 21, 2010, 08:10:02 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
373421
Posts
41422
Topics
94154
Members
Latest Member:
Quiksilver93
more news...
Search:
Advanced search
|
Tag Cloud
Welcome to the Comodo Forum
Desktop Security Products & Services
Comodo Internet Security - CIS
News / Announcements / Feedback - CIS
Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
4
5
[
6
]
7
Author
Topic: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate? (Read 8268 times)
Matty_R
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 2065
Nice to see you,to see you nice!
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #75 on:
November 30, 2009, 04:27:18 PM »
There is one part of the AMTSO review which i find a bit strange and IMO could do with some adjustment. The person who does an Analysis Request, whether that be me, you, the tester, Joe from down the pub must receive written support (evidenced by signatures) of at least 3 AMTSO individual members or representatives of such.
If the Filer (the one asking for the review) is a member then that counts for 1 of the 3.
What i would like to see happen is someone come forward and say we are going to do a test and we are going to do it to AMTSO guidlines. We have member A, B + C who are going to submit/sign for an analysis request and then the AMTSO shall (this is the tricky bit) solicit from it`s members voluteers to do the analysis.
It`s looks like it costs a few quid to join, i would hope that soon compliant tests are forthcoming otherwise what`s the point of being a member!
Matt
Logged
Soya
is Dirk Diggler :p
Endymion
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 1121
Reality is subordinate to perception
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #76 on:
November 30, 2009, 05:00:32 PM »
Quote from: Matty_R on November 30, 2009, 04:27:18 PM
There is one part of the AMTSO review which i find a bit strange and IMO could do with some adjustment. The person who does an Analysis Request, whether that be me, you, the tester, Joe from down the pub must receive written support (evidenced by signatures) of at least 3 AMTSO individual members or representatives of such.
If the Filer (the one asking for the review) is a member then that counts for 1 of the 3.
Indeed that's the paragraph 1.b from the "review process" section though it it would be strange if that was the reason that insofar seemingly prevented testers to file their own tests whenever due for imminent publication ( paragraph 1.b from "Procedures\Scope" section) since that draft was approved on May whereas instead such testers behaved in a way that
elicited a public article
from a member of the
AMTSO board of directors
(which is entitled to appoint who will take part to the RAB each year) also stressing out that there is no formal definition of compliance yet.
Soon after the introduction paragraph of the AMTSO Analysis of Review Process document it was mentioned that changes to the procedures and processes are to be expected and hopefully these anticipated changes will address the current absence of peer reviewed tests in a less convoluted way and encourage testers
to be used to submit their tests before publication
now that they are affiliated with an organization that give them that possibility even more when their membership required a quid.
«
Last Edit: November 30, 2009, 05:40:21 PM by Endymion
»
Logged
I have learnt silence from the talkative, toleration from the intolerant, and kindness from the unkind; yet strange, I am ungrateful to these teachers.
Kahlil Gibran (1883 - 1931)
Kyle
Computer Security Testing Group
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 3370
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #77 on:
November 30, 2009, 09:57:33 PM »
One thing I'm wondering.. If AMTSO tests end up fading away... will comodo participate in any other tests?
Logged
Windows XP
E5200 2.5ghz [at] 3.33ghz, POV 9800gt 512mb, 2gb DDR2 RAM. 500gb. HDD
Ubuntu
P4 [at] 3ghz, Radeon x300 128mb
1gb DDR2 Ram 80GB HDD
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 8651
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #78 on:
November 30, 2009, 11:23:16 PM »
Quote from: Matty_R on November 30, 2009, 04:27:18 PM
There is one part of the AMTSO review which i find a bit strange and IMO could do with some adjustment. The person who does an Analysis Request, whether that be me, you, the tester, Joe from down the pub must receive written support (evidenced by signatures) of at least 3 AMTSO individual members or representatives of such.
If the Filer (the one asking for the review) is a member then that counts for 1 of the 3.
What i would like to see happen is someone come forward and say we are going to do a test and we are going to do it to AMTSO guidlines. We have member A, B + C who are going to submit/sign for an analysis request and then the AMTSO shall (this is the tricky bit) solicit from it`s members voluteers to do the analysis.
It`s looks like it costs a few quid to join, i would hope that soon compliant tests are forthcoming otherwise what`s the point of being a member!
Matt
good few testing organisations are members. So they themselves would have enough votes to get their own tests accepted for a review...
melih
Logged
Who is Melih? What is he trying to do?
--
Follow me on Twitter
panic
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 8105
substance constant, depth variable
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #79 on:
November 30, 2009, 11:33:46 PM »
Quote from: Kyle on November 30, 2009, 09:57:33 PM
One thing I'm wondering.. If AMTSO tests end up fading away... will comodo participate in any other tests?
They would have to exist before they could fade away.
Give it time - it's not as easy as we would believe it to be.
Logged
As your mums would say, "If you can't play nice with all the other kiddies, go home".
All users are asked to please read and abide by the
Comodo Forum Policy
.
If you don't like it, don't use the forum.
HeffeD
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 1690
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #80 on:
December 01, 2009, 12:22:21 AM »
Quote from: panic on November 30, 2009, 11:33:46 PM
They would have to exist before they could fade away.
Give it time - it's not as easy as we would believe it to be.
Maybe that's the point though. Is it so tough to devise a proper test that nobody will bother?
Logged
Can
you
beat my gladiator?
panic
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 8105
substance constant, depth variable
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #81 on:
December 01, 2009, 01:17:06 AM »
Quote from: HeffeD on December 01, 2009, 12:22:21 AM
Maybe that's the point though. Is it so tough to devise a proper test that nobody will bother?
I think it's more a case of it being so different to what people have been doing for 20 odd years.
Another thing to consider is that if a company produces an AMTSO compliant test suite, could this be perceived as saying their prior test methods had not kept pace with the changing nature of malware?
Just a thought.
Ewen :-)
Logged
As your mums would say, "If you can't play nice with all the other kiddies, go home".
All users are asked to please read and abide by the
Comodo Forum Policy
.
If you don't like it, don't use the forum.
HeffeD
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 1690
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #82 on:
December 01, 2009, 02:24:38 AM »
Quote from: panic on December 01, 2009, 01:17:06 AM
Another thing to consider is that if a company produces an AMTSO compliant test suite, could this be perceived as saying their prior test methods had not kept pace with the changing nature of malware?
Yes, I guess this could very well be a concern to the testers. Although I think that even
they
have to know that as the face of malware changes, they need to change with it or be left behind. Look at Adaware and Spybot. The had the entire spyware/adware protection market. No competition but themselves. They had every opportunity to be the absolute kings, but instead of keeping up, they dropped behind.
I guess like you said, it may take time. I suppose all we can hope for is that they feel it's worth taking the time to change their methodology. Otherwise all testing will be largely irrelevant, as we are beginning to see...
Logged
Can
you
beat my gladiator?
hkjoj
Comodo Loves me
Offline
Posts: 139
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #83 on:
December 01, 2009, 04:12:49 AM »
Quote from: Kyle on November 30, 2009, 09:57:33 PM
One thing I'm wondering.. If AMTSO tests end up fading away... will comodo participate in any other tests?
After reading and writing so much. I already have no hope on this.
I'm lossing trust on Comodo and Melih.
«
Last Edit: December 01, 2009, 04:15:11 AM by hkjoj
»
Logged
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 8651
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #84 on:
December 01, 2009, 04:39:02 AM »
Quote from: Kyle on November 30, 2009, 09:57:33 PM
One thing I'm wondering.. If AMTSO tests end up fading away... will comodo participate in any other tests?
Comodo already participates in MANY tests.... From Matousec to some others....The issue is not about participation or not but which one Comodo would like to put its name to and stand behind. There is none today! We are working with a vendor or two...but too early..
I believe AMTSO has enough marketing pull that it will happen..
Melih
Logged
Who is Melih? What is he trying to do?
--
Follow me on Twitter
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 8651
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #85 on:
December 01, 2009, 06:46:49 AM »
Well, here is the first to go thru AMTSO review according to this post
(
http://forums.comodo.com/feedbackcommentsannouncementsnews_cis/petition_for_cis_to_be_tested_by_nsslabs-t46381.0.html;msg346362#msg346362
)
Melih
Logged
Who is Melih? What is he trying to do?
--
Follow me on Twitter
Endymion
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 1121
Reality is subordinate to perception
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #86 on:
December 01, 2009, 07:15:28 AM »
Then this mean that the final result of the analysis shall be posted publicly (Paragraph 11 from the "review process" section) hopefully soon enough.
I hope though to see fulfilled also the part that mention that
tests due for imminent publication can be submitted
as well.
«
Last Edit: December 01, 2009, 07:24:10 AM by Endymion
»
Logged
I have learnt silence from the talkative, toleration from the intolerant, and kindness from the unkind; yet strange, I am ungrateful to these teachers.
Kahlil Gibran (1883 - 1931)
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 8651
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #87 on:
December 02, 2009, 09:50:01 PM »
As soon as we all realised that NSS is already being reviewed by AMTSO, all the doubters about if any test will go to AMTSO review board or not went quiet
Melih
Logged
Who is Melih? What is he trying to do?
--
Follow me on Twitter
languy99
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 917
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #88 on:
December 02, 2009, 10:59:05 PM »
so is comodo going to be tested by NSS then?
Logged
http://www.youtube.com/languy99
Software Reviews For All
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
Offline
Posts: 8651
Re: Is this the kind of test Comodo Prefer to Participate?
«
Reply #89 on:
December 02, 2009, 11:56:11 PM »
Quote from: languy99 on December 02, 2009, 10:59:05 PM
so is comodo going to be tested by NSS then?
If/When AMTSO gives their blessing..we will request a test...
Melih
Logged
Who is Melih? What is he trying to do?
--
Follow me on Twitter
Tags:
Pages:
1
...
4
5
[
6
]
7
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General Category
-----------------------------
=> Melih's Corner - CEO Talk/Discussions/Blog
=> Comodo.TV - Our Internet Video Channel
===> Comodo.TV - News and Announcements
===> Comodo.TV - Program Lineup
===> Audience Feedback and Suggestions
=> Which Product do you want Comodo to develop next?
=> How Can I Help Comodo? (Please We Need You!)
===> Report Comodo Forum / Web Site Issues
===> Please Tell Us Your Views and Vote Here!
===> Help Spread the Word - Banners and Logos
=> General Discussion (off topic) Anything and everything...
===> Member Confessions :-)
===> Funny Photos :-)
===> Cool Stuff
-----------------------------
Desktop Security Products & Services
-----------------------------
=> Comodo Internet Security - CIS
===> News / Announcements / Feedback - CIS
=====> Wishlist - CIS
===> AV False Positive/Negative Detection Reporting
===> Help - CIS
=====> Guides - CIS
=====> AntiVirus Help - CIS
=======> AntiVirus FAQ - CIS
=====> Firewall Help - CIS
=======> Firewall FAQ - CIS
=====> Defense+ / Sandbox Help - CIS
=======> Defense+ / Sandbox FAQ - CIS
=====> Install / Setup / Configuration Help - CIS
=======> Install / Setup / Configuration FAQ - CIS
===> Bug Report - CIS
=> Comodo Backup - CB
===> News / Announcements / Feedback - CB
===> Comodo Online Backup - COB
===> Help - CB
=====> FAQ - CB
=> Comodo Time Machine - CTM
===> News / Announcements / Feedback - CTM
===> Help - CTM
=====> FAQ - CTM
===> Bug Reports - CTM
=> Comodo Dragon - CD
===> News / Announcements / Feedback - CD
=====> Wishlist - CD
===> Help - CD
=====> FAQ - CD
===> Bug Reports - CD
=> Comodo Disk Encryption - CDE
===> News / Announcements / Feedback - CDE
=====> Wishlist - CDE
===> Help - CDE
=====> FAQ - CDE
===> Bug Reports - CDE
===> Beta Corner - CDE
=> Comodo Secure Email - CSE
===> News / Announcements / Feedback - CSE
===> Help - CSE
=====> FAQ - CSE
===> Bug Reports - CSE
=> Comodo EasyVPN - CEVPN
===> News / Announcements / Feedback - CEVPN
===> Help - CEVPN
=====> FAQ - CEVPN
===> Bug reports - CEVPN
=> Comodo AntiSpam - CAS
=> Comodo TrustConnect - CTC
=> HopSurf - CHS
=> Comodo Instant Malware Analysis Online - CIMA
=> Verification Engine - CVE
-----------------------------
Desktop Utilities & Services
-----------------------------
=> Comodo System Cleaner - File/Registry/Privacy Cleaner - CSC
===> News / Announcements / Feedback - CSC
===> Help - CSC
=====> FAQ - CSC
=> Comodo Cloud Scanner - CCS
===> News / Announcements / Feedback - CCS
===> FAQ - CCS
=> Live PC Support
-----------------------------
Business / Enterprise Security Products & Services
-----------------------------
=> Digital Certificates
===> Code Signing Certificate
===> Content Verification Certificate
===> Email Certificate
===> SSL Certificate
=> PCI DSS Compliance
=> Comodo Endpoint Security Manager
=> Two Factor Authentication for Web Applications
=> Trustlogo
=> Hacker Guardian
-----------------------------
Learn about Computer Security and Interact with Security Experts
-----------------------------
=> General Security Questions and Comments
=> Virus/Malware Removal Assistance
=> Leak Testing/Attacks/Vulnerability Research
=> Digital Certificates, Encryption and Digital Signing
=> Other Security Products
-----------------------------
International Comodo Forums
-----------------------------
=> International Comodo Forums
===> 汉语语言, 漢語語言 / Chinese Simplified, Traditional
===> Česky / Czech
===> Dansk / Danish
===> Nederlands / Dutch
===> Suomi / Finnish
===> Francais / French
===> Deutsch / German
===> ελληνικά / Greek
===> Magyar / Hungarian
===> Italiano / Italian
===> Nihongo / Japanese
===> Norsk / Norwegian
===> Polski / Polish
===> Português/Portuguese
===> Română / Romanian
===> По-русски / Russian
===> Slovenský / Slovak
===> Slovenščina / Slovenian
===> Espanol / Spanish
===> Svenska / Swedish
===> Turkce / Turkish
===> Українська / Ukrainian
===> Việt / Vietnamese
-----------------------------
Other
-----------------------------
=> Forum Policy Violation Board
-----------------------------
Archived Boards
-----------------------------
=> Discontinued Products
===> Comodo Anti-Viruspyware (CAVS)
=====> Help for Comodo AntiVirus
=====> FAQ for Comodo Anti-ViruSpyware
=====> Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News about CAVS
===> Comodo BOClean Anti-Malware
=====> Announcements
=====> Comodo BOClean Anti-Malware FAQ
===> Comodo Diskshield
===> Comodo Firewall
=====> Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News
=====> Help for v3
=====> Help for v2
=====> Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Comodo firewall
=====> Comodo Firewall Translations
=====> Bug Reports
===> i-Vault
===> Launch Pad (Discontinued)
===> Comodo Meet (Web Conferencing Product) (Discontinued)
===> Comodo Memory Firewall(Buffer Overflow Protection)
=====> Comodo Memory Firewall Beta Corner
=====> Help
=====> Frequently Asked Questions (Comodo Memory Firewall)
=====> Feedback/Comments/Announcements/News
===> Safesurf
===> Trusttoolbar (Discontinued)
===> Trustfax (online faxing) (discontinued)
===> Trustix Enterprise Firewall
===> User Anywhere (Remote Access product) (Discontinued)
===> UserTrust - First Independent Website Rating - Empowering our users!
===> Comodo Vulnerability Analyzer - CVA
===> ZTL
Page created in 0.06 seconds with 17 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.11
|
SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by
7dana.com