Comodo Firewall Wishlist v5[Closed]

[Guest]

[Júštiñ™]

Hello,

Please post any features that you would like to see in future versions of Comodo Firewall.

We look forward to seeing your suggestions!

Justin

[Someone]

Maybe already requested. I've been trying out Kerio 2.1.5 and i have a note on terminology:

Source and remote- this confuses me, and the main reason i didn't mess with the rules.

It should be either source and destination;
or make terminology for in or out regardless, with local(our pc) and remote (other).

Maybe it's irrelevant for CPF 3, but i must say this. One of the things the FW (strictly FW) really needs.

What do you think?

[Beanie]

from the previous wishlist:

So, to re-iterate in to the wishlist:

 - faster/more efficient, lighter on cpu/memory network filtering rules implementation under very heavy network usage scenarios

and

I would like ICMP to be a protocol option for application rules. additionally, Comodo should prompt for programs sending out pings.

[panic]

Maybe already requested. I've been trying out Kerio 2.1.5 and i have a note on terminology:

Source and remote- this confuses me, and the main reason i didn't mess with the rules.

It should be either source and destination;
or make terminology for in or out regardless, with local(our pc) and remote (other).

Maybe it's irrelevant for CPF 3, but i must say this. One of the things the FW (strictly FW) really needs.

What do you think?

What version of CFP are you running? They have used the terms "source" and "destination" since about version 2.1.

Cheers,
Ewen :-)

[Someone]

I've been PMing soyabeaner and i understood. Sorry, you can even delete it.
I'm trying other FWs, i'll try Sygate too before returning to Comodo. I never messed with NM when reading the FAQs. But using these "do it yourself" FWs, questions arise.

Sorry for that.

[panic]

I've been PMing soyabeaner and i understood. Sorry, you can even delete it.
I'm trying other FWs, i'll try Sygate too before returning to Comodo. I never messed with NM when reading the FAQs. But using these "do it yourself" FWs, questions arise.

Sorry for that.

No probs. Just wanted to make sure that you knew that teh latest version had already incorporated this change and we all found their old terminology a tad confusing.

Hope to see you back with CFP shortly.
Ewen :-)

[LeoniAquila]

Hi!

I really wish a slightly improved UI for the Application Monitor and Component Monitor; the rows one can mark could be better highlighted. It would also be nice being able to navigate with the arrow-keys on the keyboard - not just click every row with the coursor! Also, in the Application Monitor, it is able to delete rules with the keyboards "Delete" key - please add this to the Component Monitor too! Sometimes you have old rules from uninstalled programs that you want to delete as quick and easy as possible.

Thanks
/L

[rodneymckay]

Right click on applications option for "all" incidents of the application that is indicated, such as Firefox being listed about 10 times.  If I choose to delete for example.

[Kolme]

I really like comodo firewall so my wish is for it, is to be able to run it on windows xp x64.

[ballpenxp]

In network controls,the grid of rules, would u add a column that for us write comments?
I often forget why set the rule.

thanks

[Arkangyal]

Switch to switch off emergency mode possibility  .

[Bluesman]

I really like comodo firewall so my wish is for it, is to be able to run it on windows xp x64.

Just wait for v3.0 (first beta is scheduled to be released 16 april). That version will work on x64.

[web-guy]

I found this else where and am not if it has been addressed, so here goes:

Quote

COMODO:

There are some downright annoying things about this program for people trying to do any sort of forensics:
1) All logs, rule lists, etc. are special UI widgets. They don't respond to keyboard input. You can't down arrow through logs checking for outstanding items. You have to click each one. Boy that really sucks!
2) The detail box at the bottom of the log screen is way to small and is not resizable. So given #1 and #2, forget rapid review of things that have happened while you were away.
3) You can't select text in any of these windows so I hope you like typing if you want to do reverse whois. (A copy to clipboard option is really required here.
4) Logs are not sortable by clicking column headings. (Can only sort open connections listings by application name.
5) Forget trying to group logs by IP address or port. This data is concatenated on the end of the Description column. This data should be in it's own sortable column.

End Quote:

As for me, I say there needs to be the option to create a rescue disk.  I didn't notice it in the stable release of cavs.  Also, there must be an option for scanning multiple levels of archived files.  Zip files, etc...  At least 6 levels deep.


Moderator's Note:  This post was moved from the CAVS Wishlist, as it appears to apply primarily to CFP.  The last item noted does apply to CAVS.

[xiuhcoatl]

 
Looks like Comodo is a great product to me, however I would like to be able to apply rules to Interfaces rather than IP ranges.  I connect to various wireless network but often use my RJ11 to share the conection to PCs That may not have wireless.  The IP range on the Wireless Can Change from 10.X.X.X to 192.168.X.X.X  As It is I have different .reg exports I apply to chang My settings on Command.  Another thing you could add is a option to load and save diferent configs this would be very easy as all you would have to do is save .reg settings its basically what I am doing now.   

Thanks for all your hard work
keep it up I have yet to try CAVS or other products but if they maintain this level of Quality and functionality I am sure I would be impressed

[securePC]

I am currently using symantec norton internet security on my vista notebook.
The firewall component handles the program control without bothering me with pop ups. It makes its own decision. Can you incorporate something similar in the newer version CPF. I have CPF on my other computer and there is constant pop ups asking me to grant or deny connection even after i grant access and set to remember. I think many users including myself will opt out of configuring the ports if not require.
Otherwise CPF is a superb firewall. It offers outstanding protection. I cannot wait to see how it progresses and improve. This is a very generous and clever way to advertise. Thank you comodo.
 

[Tags:]