Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 17, 2008, 05:48:47 AM

Login with username, password and session length

155240 Posts
19189 Topics
47335 Members

Latest Member: sabino59

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Desktop Security Products
| |-+  Comodo Secure Email (CSE) Product
| | |-+  CSE Beta Corner
| | | |-+  SecureEmail ...very nice .......BUT
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: SecureEmail ...very nice .......BUT  (Read 1026 times)
valldemossa
Comodo Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 35


« on: December 04, 2007, 09:05:47 AM »

Hi Shane, and others

I'm just trying to get my head round the security of email  and communication via the net. Secure Email, in general not the product itself, is fine but unfortunately it only works for the initiator sending the mail and the recipients of that mail. That appears to be the end of the story as the recipient has to be compliant with the idea otherwise it all falls flat.

Just take this scenario.
I make an order over the net. Secure and certificated site to enter logon details, secure site for other account details and secure site for payments. Everything is wonderful ............. until you realise that the Vendor sends an unencrypted and uncertificated e-mail with your name, address, telephone number and e-mail address, order number, reference number, etc. Next the payments details come through showing type of card used, often the bank supplier of that card, the final 4 digits of the card and lo and behold your name and card address, all unencrypted.

My point being, that until there is a method to force everyone to send sensitive information securely over the net, the individual doing their own little bit will make no significant difference.

Regards, V
Logged

Pentium 4 HT - 1GB RAM - 3.4 GHz CPU
XP Prof SP3 x32 - CFP 3.0.22.349 (FW: Custom - D+: Safe) - Avast! HE 4.8.1195  - Threatfire 3.5.0 - BOClean 4.26 - CMF 2.0.4.20 - Windows Defender - Spyware Terminator 2.2.1.433(no HIPS) - Spybot TeaTimer  1.5.2 - WinPatrol 15.0.2008.0
Melih
Comodo's Hero
Administrator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4748



« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2007, 09:24:13 AM »

fully agreed with you!

But its like there is a guy on the floor bleeding and we say, unless everyone is going to help i will not Smiley

We must do our bit! And as we get more people, the market will be forced and this will be a best security practice that businesses will have to do.

Melih
Logged
valldemossa
Comodo Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 35


« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2007, 10:43:47 AM »


But its like there is a guy on the floor bleeding and we say, unless everyone is going to help i will not Smiley


Not sure that's the most fitting analogy, Melih. Thinking


We must do our bit! And as we get more people, the market will be forced and this will be a best security practice that businesses will have to do.


The scenario I laid out happens all the time and it's not just small businesses, it's also those that have internal auditors vetting security of their computer systems as they are developed. (And external auditors periodically) Why are these insecure practices not picked up? It appears that there is less accountability on the WWW where the need is far greater than there was on mainframe systems in the past.

Although it's impossible to police the web itself, many individual countries do have the powers in place to enforce best practices from companies and take necessary action against those who do not comply.
So why is no action being taken?

Silly question really, when Government Departments in the UK allow account details of all individuals claiming child benefit to be sent on unencrypted CDs via the post and lose them.

Regards, V

 
Logged

Pentium 4 HT - 1GB RAM - 3.4 GHz CPU
XP Prof SP3 x32 - CFP 3.0.22.349 (FW: Custom - D+: Safe) - Avast! HE 4.8.1195  - Threatfire 3.5.0 - BOClean 4.26 - CMF 2.0.4.20 - Windows Defender - Spyware Terminator 2.2.1.433(no HIPS) - Spybot TeaTimer  1.5.2 - WinPatrol 15.0.2008.0
Comodo_Shane
Global Moderator
Comodo Family Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 82



« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2007, 11:22:20 AM »

"Silly question really, when Government Departments in the UK allow account details of all individuals claiming child benefit to be sent on unencrypted CDs via the post and lose them.

Regards, V"

You see, they should have had secure email Smiley
Logged
Tags:
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Firewall
Page created in 0.101 seconds with 19 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com