I appreciate your point of view, but once again, this example is not being singled out. My view was reached after seeing the following basic mistakes:
1)auto allow if alert is not answered
2)crashing the firewall in flooding
3)allowing rootkit installation
4)allowing ICMP attacks
5)birthday message from the coder
etc etc..
There is a big difference between V3 being such a powerful product and having compatibility issues on its launch on a brand new OS platform for 32 and 64 bit systems and making the above basic mistakes! Hope you can see that point of view..
Again to recap: Making basic mistakes about security over and over on a 2 year old product on a mature OS is totally different than a brand new product having bugs/compatibility issues on a Brand New OS with such huge integration with that particular OS for security...
So I will see and raise to $2

Melih
even if i'm maybe the one that got reasons to slap OA team cause of my short beta OA team participation that finished very fast cause I had big clash with mike that ended with my permanent ban in their forum as i helped them a lot,
what i'm reading makes me feel like i would see someone throw to the lions.
i think they don't need all those comments to understand their lesson.
we should stop those comments, i believe comodo has nothing to prove about the quality of his FW,
and i thought those kinds of posts were over.
they're in trouble, so what, flaming starts again?
all of us that use comodo know why they choosed it, but let's stay humble,
we never know what the future is made of.