SiteInspector free web version

[Guest]

[morphiusz]

No.
Not right now.

[Tech]

No.
Not right now.

Are these suppose to be answer to my questions? I'm not following you.
Also, please, consider not using images hosted in imageshack.us here in forums.
It could be not being displayed in many computers.
See: http://www.spicytricks.com/2011/03/imageshack-error-unregister-domain-in.html

[morphiusz]

Please, let me explain little more bit .

You can see SiteInspector as a:

- web service - visiting http://siteinspector.comodo.com you can use this service only on-demand. Devs are working on integrating it to the CIS and Dragon

- HackerGuardian scanning - it's a sofware which protected certificated sites and does a scan everyday.. the SI is used to detect any exploits, malicious code on the site.


Right now there aren't any toolbar or addon or whatever. You can only check sites by visiting mentoined url.
Right?

Note: Devs are working right now on integrated SI to CIS/Dragon.

Thanks for imageshack advice.

[Tech]

Thanks morphiusz. Got it. I can't use it right now. I'll wait.

[Boris 3]

Looking in the google app store for extensions for Dragon, I stumbled on sth called Traffic Light. It's developed by Bit Defender, it's still in beta version and in my understanding of what I read is similar to Site Inspector. I didn't install it, so I can't tell more.

Is there a deadline for the integration of Site Inspector either in CIS, Dragon or Secure DNS?

Boris

[RossPH]

I see many questions about integration of SiteInspector into SecureDNS, CIS and Dragon. 

We are working on it,  but there a lot of improvements we need to make before it can be done.  We are optimising and improving the scanning.  We also need to create a infrastructure capable of supporting all the requests from CIS and Dragon.

We hope to have something ready by Q4 2011.  Though we may have some integration in SecureDNS before then.

I saw someone mention HackerGuardian/HackerProof,  HackerProof and SiteInspector are completely different, HackerProof scans for vulnerabilities and SiteInspector scans for attacks.

[Boris 3]

Thank you for your answer Ross.

[Androo Circe]

Thank you Ross for the update, much appreciated.

Circe.

[wasgij6]

I see many questions about integration of SiteInspector into SecureDNS, CIS and Dragon. 

We are working on it,  but there a lot of improvements we need to make before it can be done.  We are optimising and improving the scanning.  We also need to create a infrastructure capable of supporting all the requests from CIS and Dragon.

We hope to have something ready by Q4 2011.  Though we may have some integration in SecureDNS before then.

I saw someone mention HackerGuardian/HackerProof,  HackerProof and SiteInspector are completely different, HackerProof scans for vulnerabilities and SiteInspector scans for attacks.

thanks a lot for coming in and giving us some information but what really is on my mind is how are you going to integrate SI into CIS.
can you tell us anything about that?

thanks for the great work and product

[RossPH]

thanks a lot for coming in and giving us some information but what really is on my mind is how are you going to integrate SI into CIS.
can you tell us anything about that?

thanks for the great work and product

We haven't finalized any of the design for integration into CIS.  The actual CIS implementation will be up to the CIS team.  We are concentrating on providing a service that will be suitable. 

[wasgij6]

We haven't finalized any of the design for integration into CIS.  The actual CIS implementation will be up to the CIS team.  We are concentrating on providing a service that will be suitable. 

thanks for the response
keep up the great work

[morphiusz]

if someone don't know - then - there is a new feature in SI - unsafe IP matching .

[trscsaeg]

if someone don't know - then - there is a new feature in SI - unsafe IP matching .

what is unsafe ip matching?

could you give an example of why the user would use this feature?

[morphiusz]

These 2 sent me vadim:

Examples of unsafe IP match checking:
 http://siteinspector.comodo.com/public/reports/41910
 http://siteinspector.comodo.com/public/reports/41902

When some site is detected as  dangerous its IP is saved and other sites with this IP are detected as a suspicious because of a same IP as a malicious site.

[wasgij6]

if someone don't know - then - there is a new feature in SI - unsafe IP matching .

this is an awesome feature and should help scanning speed.
this makes me wonder how many more features are going to be added

[Tags:]