POLL: Is CPF 3 BETA 3.0.9.229 Currenty Stable?[CLOSED]

[Guest]

[Jern]

Stable here, I had the 3.0.8.214 running under Vista and XP Pro SP2 and never had any problems, crashes or something else.

Installing 3.0.9.229 now  .

For me the beta is good enoug, It's the best firewall i've had.

Grtz. Jern

PS: I'm new here 

[Vista64User]

Vista 32-bit right?

[boombaard]

i had 3.08 running for 22 days before i had to reboot to install 3.09, so i'd say it's stable.. just the graphical glitches in the add program to firewall interface dialogs are a bit annoying

[rubenov]

For me:

Firewall module is stable.

Defense+ module not, but i don´t use it 

[Jern]

me ? Vista 32 bit
Everything stable, no BSoD's or something for 3.0.8.214.
I'm now runnig XP Pro 32 bit on that computer wich has 3.0.9.229 installed since today, only had a BSoD at first reboot, running stable now.

btw: I switched back to XP 'cuz CMG was conflicting with that activation thingie from Vista and i found out a bit too late, aaand i'm not quite sure how to make a dualboot with Vista/XP.

I'd say for me it's stable enoug, never encountered problems exept for that one BSoD.

[v941726]

i had too many problems to count on all my digits. couldn't even get it to create a crash dump. using sunbelt and avast AV for now. they seem quite good so i'm in no hurry

kpc

[Justin L.]

My experience has been good with the current beta, it's very stable and hasn't given me any issues, but I did find some bugs.

[ciaba]

No problems here on XP/SP2 (32), only a bug with games(freez on launch), but I've solved with defense setting, so nothing seriously. I dont vote becouse it is stable but for some people is not, so i think we could call this a GAMMA version.
....Any way, at the end, good for me.

[ramancars]

Vista 32 bit.

CFP 3.0.9 provoked a serious conflict with my sunbelt antispyware, Counterspy. Counterspy used practically all of the cpu without any popups, and I can not find a way to put CFP on a safelist in Counterspy.

3.0.8 runs without any serious problems for me tho...

[foxman]

So far so good for me too, except it still "bug" me like hell on the fast user switching part (which I use a lot), not just fast user switching, also logging in and logging out as different users... all those copies of CFP3 running about are driving me nuts!.... 

[boombaard]

addendum: p2p transfers of any kind (even 200kb/s ftp transfers with 13 connections open total) are hell on cfp.. cpu usage shoots up to 30% or more continuous use.. firewall configured correctly, everything has the rights it should have

winxp sp2
athlon 64 3500+
1.5GB ram

[Japo]

I don't use it yet so I won't vote, but I'm confident that reaching release quality won't take forever. I remember when the first alpha was released and Melih advised tremendous caution as if it was as dangerous as a nuclear bomb. Now it's reportedly a pretty usable beta, the release is not far away notwithstanding individual experiences. (If you find bugs, report them please!)

[grayhair]

   I have the Beta firewall on my main at home work computer.  I am also using Comodo anti-virus, BOCleaner, and VEngine.  I am using mostly the default settings on all.  The firewall blocks lots of stuff.  My computer is running great.  My computer is happy, therefore, I am happy!  I think the firewall is stable.  I am still waiting for the final version before I install on my Vista computer--then I can trash the existing (bleep) firewall on it.

 

[Tags:]