Comodo Antispam dead?

[Guest]

[Melih]

Could we have a list of developer teams for each comodo product?

I presume each developer devotes 100% of his time to only one product?

Each product has a "team" of people for it and yes they all work 100% on it.

thanks
Melih

[Eric Cryptid]

Melih is probably better at answering this but I don't think it makes a great deal of sense for CPF Staff to list the individual Developers Names for each particuar product and their role and post them onto this open forum. There are "dedicated teams" and that's all we need to know.

Eric

[Melih]

Why doesn't it make sense? I for one would like to be able to see what the quality of people Comodo has... If not the whole team, at least the few key lead people...

Or are you afraid, Comodo isn't able to backup their claims of having hundreds of developers dedicated to each product?

We would not reveal details of our employees for many reasons. From privacy to headhunting etc etc..

I can confirm that we have over 250 programmers working on our products.

You either believe or not... your choice..

thanks

Melih

[Luketan]

We would not reveal details of our employees for many reasons. From privacy to headhunting etc etc..

I can confirm that we have over 250 programmers working on our products.

You either believe or not... your choice..

thanks

Melih

Okay since you give me no reason to believe, the default is not to believe.

[panic]

Okay since you give me no reason to believe, the default is not to believe.

Hey Luketan,

In the organization I work for, there are more than 40 people working in several sensitive fields. It would take an enforceable court order for our organization to divulge their IDs to an appropriate authority.

Regardless of any other business or organizational criteria, we must respect the provisions of our local Privacy Act that precludes public employee disclosure without prior approval.

Despite your belief or disbelief, there are times when it is simply not appropriate to disclose internal organizational details.

Comodo, in this instance, have chosen not to disclose.

You, in this instance, have chosen not to believe.

Ewen :-)

[giraffe]

Okay since you give me no reason to believe, the default is not to believe.

He gives no reason not to believe, therefore the default is to believe (this happens with religion and we know how much trouble that causes!

[Luketan]

He gives no reason not to believe, therefore the default is to believe (this happens with religion and we know how much trouble that causes!

Yes i agree. To believe the claim here would be the same as to believe in religion. And that is why there are so many religions and hence so much conflict

[Pedro*]

Lusher?

[Toxteth O'Grady]

Okay since you give me no reason to believe, the default is not to believe.

So you always assume people lie to you unless proven otherwise? That says more about you than about "the others", as far as I'm concerned.

Apart from that, what would be good enough in this case? You want a list of names, so you get one. It contains 5, 10, 50, or who knows how many names of programmers and other people who are involved. There is no way you could possibly verify the validity\accuracy of that list. With or without list, the situation is always the same for you.

[Pedro*]

Who cares, and what's that with us?
Oh man this is so funny! 

[Melih]

Okay since you give me no reason to believe, the default is not to believe.

OK

thanks

Melih

[Melih]

So you always assume people lie to you unless proven otherwise? That says more about you than about "the others", as far as I'm concerned.

Apart from that, what would be good enough in this case? You want a list of names, so you get one. It contains 5, 10, 50, or who knows how many names of programmers and other people who are involved. There is no way you could possibly verify the validity\accuracy of that list. With or without list, the situation is always the same for you.

thats an excellent point.

Unless you can verify how can you validate the claim then whats the point?
And what is your process of validation of these names Luketan? Can you pls tell us how you were going to validate that
1)they exist
2)they work for Comodo
3)they work for the projects we claim they work for

Look forward to your explanation so that we have a reason to believe you!

Melih

[xylophone]

We are aiming to get a new version to the forums within the next 4 to 5 weeks.

This first new version release mainly addresses fundamental issues with the previous version.  One such change is that we have removed and replaced the licensing system so no more activation panels.  We’ve also improved compatibility with other third party applications and with our own, including co-operation with CSE.

As with all our products we are constantly working for you to improve the quality and features, so don’t worry we also have plenty of new features lined up for subsequent versions of Comodo AntiSpam.

Regards,
Shane.

This was said in April, three months ago.  The new AntiSpam seems to just keep slipping and slipping.  Mine has been dead for months.  Does nothing. 

So another update on the new program would be nice.

[3xist]

This was said in April, three months ago.  The new AntiSpam seems to just keep slipping and slipping.  Mine has been dead for months.  Does nothing. 

So another update on the new program would be nice.

'

Dead lines can slip.

Josh

[Eric Cryptid]

Which Antivirus Product are you using?

Does it have a Mass Mailing Protection Element?

Try temp disabling your AV's email protection to see if it's that which is causing you problems.

Eric

[Tags:]