Your opinion about NOD32.

[Guest]

[Rednose]

The best solution out there right now is pay for.  Nod32.

- NOD32 isn't the best by far with signatures.
- NOD32 isn't the best with heuristics.
- NOD32 ONLY doesn't produce false positives on heuristics.

NOD32 is a little bit over-hyped on some forums If I should choose a payed solution I don't think it would be NOD32

Greetz, Red.

[eXPerience]

- NOD32 isn't the best by far with signatures.
- NOD32 isn't the best with heuristics.
- NOD32 ONLY doesn't produce false positives on heuristics.

NOD32 is a little bit over-hyped on some forums If I should choose a payed solution I don't think it would be NOD32

Greetz, Red.

Sry landmate but NOD32 is the best on heuristics, FROM the antivirusscanners !!!

But IF i would go for kaspersky as I find it the best antivirus for the moment (decent heuristics and still the best on fingerprints  )

Xan

[Rednose]

Hi Xan

The most recent test on AV-Comparatives shows that Avira has the best heuristics

Avira's AntiVir PE Premium : 81%
ESET NOD32 Anti-Virus : 71%

But ESET NOD32 produces no false positives, and that can't be said of Avira's AntiVir

Greetz, Red.

[eXPerience]

16 FP's that's almost guessing if it's fake or not. Its like the lottery  .
I must admit, antivir is better, BUT only recently. Look to the earlier reviews, NOD32 has always been the best. Also, I don't believe in heuristics... Like I said before, it's like playing on the lottery. Also, this is just one review, this has almost nothing to do with reallive  . Well yeah, times change, so do the malware.
Do you really think heuristics will do something? Wrong!!! Malware makers always, and always test their malware first on the antivirusses etc. to see if they're detected. If they are, they change something in the source. If they're not, they release them. So... heuristics is just nothing.

Xan

[eXPerience]

Cool, a topic for me and rednose alone 

Xan

To make a statement you must speak at least one sentence dutch 

Schild en vriend !!!

[Vettetech]

Never had any FP's with either NOD32 or Avira. But I like Avira over NOD32. Avira always is a top score in any av test.

[Commodus]

One more important factor is cleaning or cure. It's doesn't matter if an antivirus can detect a threat if it cannot fight it off and delete all traces (at best) 

[Rednose]

WTF happened I am critical about NOD32 and ... split off We are not on Wilders here

Greetz, Red.

[Rednose]

Well, because I am the OP in this topic I have changed the title And now Ganda is off topic so you have to split him off

Greetz, Red.

[shin-ganda]

soya 

OK, lets talk about NOD32
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

..
i know nothing about it 

ehm, seriously, among the "cracked" version, Norton & symantec are far more popular than NOD32 here.

[3xist]

soya 

OK, lets talk about NOD32
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

..
i know nothing about it 

ehm, seriously, among the "cracked" version, Norton & symantec are far more popular than NOD32 here.

The Devil Is Watching You

Josh

[Commodus]

IMO NOD32 is way overrated. It's good, but not the best. NOT ! It's good for gamers, cos it's lite. But it's detection is no better than CAVS 2 and NOD32 lacks independent lab testing.
For example take a look at Burillos testing: http://forums.comodo.com/feedbackcommentsannouncementsnews_about_cavs/huge_samples_collection-t17746.30.html
Eset Smart Security is even worse. It uses 30 - 35 mb ram. So it's not so light. The firewall in nonexistent (5% in Matousec tests and I can confirm it - I cracked it in less than 2 minutes).

Believe I used both of these products.

[eXPerience]

IMO NOD32 is way overrated

I don't think so, NOD32 is good and has always been good http://www.eset.com/products/compare-NOD32-vs-competition.php (I still don't know how to give it another name  )

Eset Smart Security is even worse

Who cares about smart security, it's the antivirus that matters with NOD32, the rest is just for the money .

ehm, seriously, among the "cracked" version, Norton & symantec are far more popular than NOD32 here.

Seriously, you  ....   aree  .... tottally ..... WRONG !!!! NOD32 is together with Kaspersky the most cracked software. You want to know why, cause (by the way, symantec and norton is the same  , symantec is the company, Norton the product) <-- they screwed it up with the resources so no cracker want to crack it  .


WARNING  : I do not promote or say cracking is good. Cracking is illegal and could be the first breach in your defence !!!

Xan

[Commodus]

VB100 % is crap testing. Everyone's passing it (almost). I mean give me a few results from independent testers and then we can talk.
For example I tested it. Ofcourse you can say I'm not independent now, but I am, cos i don't care who wins. Even Norton can be a winner I don't give a damn.  NOD32 scored a little bit better than in Burillos tests. I had over 10000 malware samples - both new and old and NOD32 got 73 %. Kaspersky got 97,5, BitDefender 98,2 Norton got 88.2 %

[shin-ganda]

Maybe thats was Symantec Client Security ? 

it's symantec AntiVirus 
we have something called google 

look here:
http://www.stanford.edu/services/ess/pc/sav.html



i think we better post more about NOD32 before someone kick us out 

vote for NOD32 

[Tags:]