Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 06, 2008, 02:17:09 PM

Login with username, password and session length

189111 Posts
22036 Topics
52847 Members

Latest Member: amwdrive

Search:     Advanced search | Tag Cloud
+  Welcome to the Comodo Forum
|-+  Learn about Computer Security and Interact with Security Experts
| |-+  Anti Virus/Malware Products/Other Security products
| | |-+  Lousiest Antispyware of 2007
« previous next »
Poll
Question: Which sucks to the max? Choose only one
Spybot - 6 (23.1%)
Windows Defender - 11 (42.3%)
Spyware Terminator - 3 (11.5%)
Super Antispyware - 0 (0%)
Spyware Blaster - 0 (0%)
Spy Remover - 1 (3.8%)
Spy Eraser - 0 (0%)
Spy Emergency - 5 (19.2%)
Total Voters: 25

Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Lousiest Antispyware of 2007  (Read 3048 times)
Goose18
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1124



« Reply #15 on: November 15, 2007, 06:57:13 PM »

Well here i go.... The only Reason Spybot Search & Destroy is not a #1 anti spyware is bacause it has limited income for research unlike most anti spyware's.. But imagine if money was not a problem I'm sure they would be a top 3 anti spyware.
Logged

Avast! 4.8, BOClean, CFP3 and did i mention Avast! 4.8 Grin  OH guess what!!! Avast! 4.8 Grin


System Specs:  Pentium 4 with HT 3.06 Ghz,  1.5GB RAM, 160 GB WDC HD, Nvidia Geforce 7600GT 256MB
MorphOS REBOL
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 779



« Reply #16 on: November 15, 2007, 07:01:38 PM »

No friend. [ at ] Ultragunner

Those have not been personal attacks on YOU.
I've read through all your latest postings.

My attacks refer to them, not YOU. As a person.

Spybot S&D is a great addition to home user's security, and YOU are trying to tell the opposite to forum readers. Same with your "detection analyses" that try to prove Avira's detection is only capable of 30 percent.

It's obvious, Mr. Prof. Comp. Shop

You try to BEND.
You try to SHAPE.

You try to pursuade people to get rid of some of the best security progs (oh, I forgot, they are free).

You should be ashamed.
And, I never said this to anyone before, I would like to not read anything new from you concerning security here.

We have many topics here relating non-security topics. Maybe we could go on discussing there? No problem with me. But please stop telling people getting rid of fine security progs just because they are free...

Your acting is WAY TOO obvious for me. You gotta learn a lot if you want to succeed. Let this be told.

Cheers again.

« Last Edit: November 15, 2007, 07:03:20 PM by MorphOS REBOL » Logged
ultragunner
Comodo Loves me
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 138



« Reply #17 on: November 15, 2007, 07:07:38 PM »

Look

Understand this, I did not said Avira is capable of 30% detection, Now who is the liar here Sad?  Stop making things up.   See my post again.  It has best detection using 3 detection methods but its defense is lacking , Im using Avira Premium, myself thank you.  So kindly think first before posting pls.  I have nothing personal against you, by the way, So Calm down. Wink  Look If you really hate paid products & dont want to pay anything for it, I dont mind, it is your computer, not mine. Cheers.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2007, 07:09:25 PM by ultragunner » Logged


 
Goose18
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1124



« Reply #18 on: November 15, 2007, 07:19:08 PM »

Well this is getting a bit to off topic... maybe we should refocus on the topic?
Logged

Avast! 4.8, BOClean, CFP3 and did i mention Avast! 4.8 Grin  OH guess what!!! Avast! 4.8 Grin


System Specs:  Pentium 4 with HT 3.06 Ghz,  1.5GB RAM, 160 GB WDC HD, Nvidia Geforce 7600GT 256MB
MorphOS REBOL
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 779



« Reply #19 on: November 15, 2007, 07:23:34 PM »

It was the site you tried to establish here that made me feel pain in the stomach.

No, you're right, it was NEVER YOU who said AVIRA WAS THAT BAD.

Maybe it's a chinese site? Sorry, you didn't tell us.

But you were talking bout the newest analysis again and again and obviously tried to promote it as a reliable source, friend.

THAT was my REAL problem with your postings, as you might have noticed, nothing else (not even the many colours of your "ads").

Smiley

« Last Edit: November 15, 2007, 07:30:00 PM by MorphOS REBOL » Logged
MorphOS REBOL
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 779



« Reply #20 on: November 15, 2007, 07:26:55 PM »

http://www.anti-malware-test.com/?q=taxonomy/term/16

It was this site you promoted, right?

Again, nothing against YOU.

Really not. But please make sure to rely on reliable sites in the future.

Is this ok?

Logged
ultragunner
Comodo Loves me
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 138



« Reply #21 on: November 15, 2007, 07:32:36 PM »

Look, I believe that every people have the right to believe what they want, & if you dont believe it, it is your opinion , not the opinion of everyone else.  Kindly Remeber that, Stop speaking for everyone else.
If you dont want to believe, that is your opinion.  Remember that human beings as a whole are not perfect & we do make mistakes like the one saying that I said that Avira is capable of 30% detection.?/
I never said that remember that.  Everyone here is entitled to their opinion.  Kindly respect my opinion also pls.  You really should stop being so close minded.
Logged


 
Ganda
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2739


teehee, peace


« Reply #22 on: November 15, 2007, 09:56:37 PM »

hellooooo, let's move this debate to "the drunken song" topic. let Ragwing, new forum moderator Clapping (congrats) move it. (where's Aladinonl when we need the debate expert Grin ).
from my personal experence, maybe Spyware Doctor? it's bloated and didn't catch anything but cookies (or maybe my comp was clean)
Logged

kyle is guilty Angry
everybody hate kyle Angry
let's all blame kyle Angry
evil prevails when kyle's around Angry
MorphOS REBOL
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 779



« Reply #23 on: November 16, 2007, 05:31:47 PM »

The lousy ol' REBOL agrees, again. (Which could be a thing heard of seldomly)

Spyware Doctor, courtesy of PC Fools, ermmm, PC Tools, is

really:::

quote ganda: Bloated and didn't catch anything but cookies (or maybe my comp was clean)

Now, ganda.... Honestly, it didn't even catch a cookie on mine.

Maybe, there's something wrong with my installation?

Smiley

I agree, this discussion should be made public now by being moved over to the totally senseless "drunken song" topic.

Logged
MorphOS REBOL
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 779



« Reply #24 on: November 16, 2007, 05:37:32 PM »

hey ganda, maybe your comp was clean because of avira, even if using the free version?
shame on you!
lol

Now we all face the new enemy: The enemy of "layered defense" defending men?

EIN PROSIT. ES MÖGE NÜTZEN. IT SHALL BE HEALTHY.

whatever...

have another beer with me?

Smiley

Logged
Rednose
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1278


Ganda's sleepy ( in his wildest dreams )


« Reply #25 on: November 16, 2007, 08:27:23 PM »

I agree with MorphOS REBOL Smiley

Windows Defender is not the same ( anymore ) as Giant Anti Spyware. I my opinion Microsoft ****ed it up completely Sad and it shouldn't be on any computer as a first line of anti spyware defence Undecided

Spybot S&D can't be the the lousiest anti spyware in my opinion. It offers a better real time protection than Windows Defender, and it has a great set of tools for novice users Smiley

So my vote goes to Windows Defender Wink

Greetz, Red.
Logged

XP 32x SP3  CFP 2.4  SSM 2.0 Free  Avast! 4.8 Home  CBOClean 4.27  CMF 2.0  SAS 4.15 Free  MBAM 1.24
Ganda
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2739


teehee, peace


« Reply #26 on: November 16, 2007, 09:08:17 PM »

EIN PROSIT. ES MÖGE NÜTZEN. IT SHALL BE HEALTHY.  what that means? Grin

Now, ganda.... Honestly, it didn't even catch a cookie on mine.
Huh that's weird. then what it did?

anyway i've been using Spyware terminator & CBOClean. so far so good  Cheers   Cheers to all
Logged

kyle is guilty Angry
everybody hate kyle Angry
let's all blame kyle Angry
evil prevails when kyle's around Angry
aladinonl
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 331



« Reply #27 on: November 18, 2007, 05:21:45 AM »

[ at ]ganda
Quote
where's Aladinonl when we need the debate expert
hruuhh, quite some time cant come to Comodo forums regularly coz now its time for me to mug.
come back just to check got any news abt CAVS.
Logged

small minds discuss people, normal minds discuss events, great minds discuss ideas
MorphOS REBOL
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 779



« Reply #28 on: November 18, 2007, 05:09:32 PM »

Ultragunner?

Errm...no friend. Not as easy. No word playing please. A man's word is a man's worth. (women not being excluded here)

Quote: Look, I believe that every people have the right to believe what they want, & if you dont believe it, it is your opinion , not the opinion of everyone else.

So you believe that believing is the great right of mankind and not believing is restricted to opinons?
(Almost sounds like some dogma of .....tology to me....well...)

Quote: Kindly Remeber that, Stop speaking for everyone else.

Remembering is a very personal thing. If I want to remember, I will, if not, well, then I will try to forget. And, oh, thanks, I wasn't aware (and never intended) to have spoken for EVERYONE ELSE. I guess I spoke for myself, and then maybe for some few others here. I never pretended anything else, like you pretended. Just to make this clear.

Quote: If you dont want to believe, that is your opinion.

Thank you, but again, sounds like a tolerant form of religion.

Quote: Remember that human beings as a whole are not perfect & we do make mistakes like the one saying that I said that Avira is capable of 30% detection.?/

Well, maybe some are better, some are worse, that's correct. But then, why do you say I was the one who was wrong? Your words are elastique. Well, enough, at least it was you, not me, who promoted a site that says 33 percent detection rate for Avira. Belief is belief, of course. But software testing should NEVER be comparable to esoteric / brainwashing techniques treachery. Period.

Quote: I never said that remember that. 

No, but the site you therefore promoted said it.
Isn't that like saying: Look, I knew he wanted to kill her, so I told him to do it and gave him my weapon. (=tongue). Now, not guilty?

Quote: Everyone here is entitled to their opinion. 

Sounds beautiful, but I wouldn't, just for instance, allow a racist murderer or a virgin killer to have his/her opinion here. Agreed?

Quote: Kindly respect my opinion also pls.

I never said I didn't respect your opinion. But you should make it always clear that it's just an opinion (just a hint) and that your opinion is based on personal experience with the things you promote, not just: hear people: the newest thing!

Quote: You really should stop being so close minded.

If this is true (i.e. me being close minded) - by the way, thanks a lot for that nice word - well, then I fear, I will stay as "CLOSE MINDED", as you said (oh, of course you will say that you didn't say it), until my very end.

there's enough brainwashing goin on. there's no need for you to help. sorry.

« Last Edit: November 18, 2007, 05:30:48 PM by MorphOS REBOL » Logged
Toggie
Global Moderator
Comodo's Hero
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1256


"Oh, let me have just a little bit of peril"


« Reply #29 on: November 19, 2007, 01:08:36 AM »

Ok guys, time out! If you're going to constantly ***** at each other, take it somewhere else please.

These topics are becoming a bit tiresome and are nothing more than a slanging match. If you wish to discuss the merits or otherwise of a give product, do so in a seemly manner, without slagging off products or each other. OK?

Thanks
Logged

One man alone can be pretty dumb sometimes, but for real bona fide stupidity, there ain't nothin' can beat teamwork.
Tags:
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SSL Firewall
Page created in 0.44 seconds with 20 queries.
Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Design by 7dana.com