Highly Recommended AntiSpyware [Recommendations]

[Guest]

[eXPerience]

Did it say what it was ?

Xan

[Eric Cryptid]

Your best bet is to google the filename of each item...

How come no one's mentioned spyware terminator?


Eric

[giraffe]

These names aren't generic - they tend to be named by the AS company. I knew one or two and they're FPs. If the app can't tell me anything I don't want it. Now uninstalled.

[eXPerience]

I have another great one Comodo Free Cleanup 

Xan

[3xist]

How come no one's mentioned spyware terminator?

Spyware Terminator. Huge resource hog. Plus it has HIPS, So wont be good with D+.

D+ is much more powerful.

Josh

[eXPerience]

How come no one's mentioned spyware terminator?


Eric

I think it has become to bloated. To much recource using and to less signatures.

Xan

[eXPerience]

Just a question , has anyone ever used spyzooka

Just looked interesting

Xan

[WaterWall]

The name says it all  I won't try it for sure  You can just smell the crap a mile away

[giraffe]

Just a question , has anyone ever used spyzooka

Just looked interesting

Xan

It costs money!

Saw this on Wilders (didn't do much research - just the 1 site):

"And Spyzooka was formerly listed as rogue application in Spywarewarrior's list of rogue/suspect websites and applications. It has since been de-listed. However, there are likely more capable spyware removers in the market than this"

ST and Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware probably do as much and are cheaper.

[eXPerience]

Well yeah, I just saw it

Xan

[eXPerience]

I've been loooking around and didn't see any clue that it would be a rogue program.
Also it has been de-listed from  Spywarewarrior's list

Xan

[andyman35]

I've been loooking around and didn't see any clue that it would be a rogue program.
Also it has been de-listed from  Spywarewarrior's list

Xan

It doesn't seem to be suspicious in any way ,it's listed as clean on Softpedia a respected site.

[3xist]

Unstickied this one for cleaning purposes.

Josh

[Info-Sec]

It doesn't seem to be suspicious in any way ,it's listed as clean on Softpedia a respected site.

On a virtual machine I installed it.  Avira, nor avast, or spyware doctor detected it.  I ran a scan, and it didn't pick up anything there fore it doesn't plant malware, nor produce FP's.  It is a very ineffective scanner and I would NOT even install it or visit the website.

[eXPerience]

I don't understand, you have avast as well as Spyware doctor, and then when a new scanner doesn't find anything it s*cks? That's just ridiculous.

LOL : Antivir is a very ineffective scanner because it didn't find anything on my pc  , as well as kaspersky, Pctools antivirus, bitdefender, NOD32, etc.

Xan

[Tags:]